Non-COVID funding in bill is ridiculous
- By ELLEN CHRISTIE
- 10
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion. Stop watching this discussion.
Thank you for reading!
Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.
Most Popular
Articles
- Texas City police investigating possible murder-suicide
- Democrats cheated to win the presidential election
- Galveston County declares itself a Second Amendment sanctuary
- Police searching for man involved in Texas City shooting
- Question of the Week: Should President Donald Trump be removed from office before Jan. 20?
- Two shot, one killed, two arrested in La Marque, police say
- As vaccine net widened, UTMB rushed to find recipients
- Venues, theaters in Galveston County face more months of closure, reduced shows
- Galveston County shorted on vaccines as state shifts supply
- Lost Cajun finds its way in League City; Galveston Restaurant Group rumors simmer
Collections
Commented
- Democrats cheated to win the presidential election (246)
- Inauguration Day can't come soon enough (172)
- Randy Weber has done nothing except abet sedition (103)
- Every day Trump lingers, America suffers and weakens (99)
- Trump's speech didn't meet incitement standard, Weber says (80)
- Texas House must impeach seditious AG Ken Paxton (75)
- 2020 election riddled with claims of voter fraud (60)
- Drag performers miss the stage, crowds in new socially distant reality (58)
- Pro-Trump mob storms US Capitol (56)
- I knew all along that this would happen (56)
(10) comments Back to story
Newt Gingrich and a Republican Congress gave President Clinton a line item veto which led to a balanced budget but the Supreme Court did not like it (See Clinton v. City of New York -1998).
President Donald Trump gave Congress a line by line list of items that should be removed from the Omnibus Bill. Pelosi did not act on it.
The Presidential line item veto should be re-explored. If it takes a Constitutional Amendment so be it.
I've always had a problem with America paying foreign countries to be our friends. At a time when so many Americans are suffering it's especially hurtful to see our leaders giving our money away so freely.
The merits of the individual spending items can certainly be debated, but you do realize that, as an example, the foreign aid requests in the Omnibus spending bill that was passed along with COVID relief bill are there because that's what the State Department requested be there. It would seem like a more efficient process would be for the Administration to first review and adjust their own spending requests prior to putting them in the spending bill and then playing dumb and trying to play politics and mislead people about how they got there
Pelosi said exactly the words we should all remember and learn from..."pass it now and read it later". Wow! We need true reform and change before our country is lost forever. These career politician's need to go back home.
This so called covid relief bill is not taxpayer money. It is not borrowed money. It is"printed" money. The instant it is printed all the nations money is de valued by the amount printed. Every paper bill, coin or pay check is worth less.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tampabay.com/news/nation-world/2020/12/25/coronavirus-relief-bill-does-not-include-foreign-aid-arts-funding-politifact/%3foutputType=amp
We know, Paula, but PELOSI bundled the two bills together.
“On Dec. 21, lawmakers in both chambers of Congress passed a $2.3 trillion spending package: a roughly $1.4 trillion omnibus spending bill — consisting of 12 different bills to fund the government during fiscal year 2021 — and a separate, approximately $900 billion bill specifically for COVID-19 relief. Lawmakers also passed several other smaller bills.”
“It’s the $1.4 trillion part of the package that included funding for U.S. policies and priorities within the country and abroad. The Facebook post conflates provisions of the COVID-19 relief bill with provisions in the omnibus spending bill ” Tampa Bay Times
“Foreign aid is money, technical assistance, and commodities that the United States provides to other countries in support of a common interest of the U.S. and that country. Opinion polls consistently report that Americans believe foreign aid is about 25% of the federal budget, when it is actually less than 1%. As the world’s wealthiest nation, the U.S. provides more assistance than any other country, but a smaller proportion of its gross national product (GNP) than other wealthy nations. Historically, support for foreign aid has been bipartisan.” Brookings.edu.
The foreign aid to the Sudan and Tibet is for food and water. People are starving in the Sudan and have a lack of potable water in Tibet. The US is the richest country in the world, and spends less than 1% of its federal budget on foreign aid. It is the right thing to do.
It is the right thing to do. The right thing to do is not to saddle everyday Americans with debt we can't afford. The right thing to do is make sure Americans can afford to support foreign countries without increasing taxes. America can't afford to support other countries financially right now without further hurting our own economy. Yes, America first!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.