In Dan Freeman’s commentary (“Private charities do good but should be watched,” The Daily News, Jan. 12), he writes, “To assure the representation of the public interest, democratically elected bodies such as city councils, legislatures and Congress should appoint one or more members of the directorate of tax-exempt foundations.”

Government-mandated appointments are a “careful what you wish for” solution. Imagine Planned Parenthood’s reaction to a Texas state legislature appointee. Still, Freeman nails it when he states “… the power to tax is the power to control.”

Directing millions of dollars in public funds (that circumvent elected bodies) bestows enormous power and influence upon appointed board members. This ability often gets monetized in a legal but ethically gray fashion.

This financial benefit, attained without the scrutiny of an election, motivates some people to “serve the community.” Out of the public eye they, and their surrogates, lobby elected officials for appointments onto coveted boards while privately discouraging appointments of people whose advocacy for the public interest may conflict with those of private interests.

Freeman’s wish to prioritize the public interest is spot on. Let’s start by demanding elections for public board members who direct taxpayer funds that circumvent democratically elected bodies.

Norman Pappous

League City


Recommended for you

(3) comments

Don Schlessinger


Dan Freeman

Thank you Norman for your letter. It shows while disagreeing on some topics, we can agree on others.

James Lippert

I agree w/ Mr. Pappous 1000%. We should DEMAND loudly for more Public Debates of the issues at the local level.

A case in point is the SAN LEON MUD (WCID). In unincorporated San Leon, the local water district has come to be in a very sad financial state. At least one local MUD Board Candidate in the upcoming May 2nd Election, Phillip "David" Haskett , is demanding a Public Debate among all the MUD Candidates for the benefit of the Public.

What makes this story interesting is that the present San Leon MUD Board President and even the MUD District Manager are protesting this Public Candidate Debate. Interesting. While we have all debated as candidates for such things as high school president, some politicians are adamantly against a debate of Candidates for a Board which exercises fiduciary responsibility for 10's of Millions of Public dollars....

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.