Amid dire economic conditions brought on by the pandemic and exacerbated by the recent weather conditions, Texas legislators are eyeing policies on prescription drug prices that could jeopardize Texas employers’ ability to provide vital accompanying health care and prescription drug coverage.

Health insurance costs for prescription drugs are now higher than for any other expense, including patient hospital costs and doctors’ payments. The cost of health insurance is ranked as the single biggest problem and priority for Texas small-business owners in a recent National Federation of Independent Business survey of members.

Despite these ongoing economic hardships, drug makers continue to raise their prices. In January alone, drug makers increased prices for over 800 drugs by an average of 4.6 percent, almost twice the predicted inflation rate for the entire year of 2021. The average cost of insulin, for example, grew by 750 percent from 2002-2019.

Texas policymakers should be applauded for recognizing there’s a prescription drug affordability problem for too many people; however, government mandates aren’t the answer.

Unfortunately, in this legislative session, dozens of prescription drug regulatory, contract or benefit mandate bills have been proposed that would dramatically increase health care costs.

For example, a policy change that legislators are considering referred to as “Non-medical Switching” or “Frozen Formulary” would significantly increase prescription drug costs by eliminating the free market forces that help drive down the cost of drugs. These bills mandate that a health plan cover brand name drugs at the same level for years, even when better and less expensive alternatives become available.

That provides drug manufacturers with the ability to charge any price with no incentive to make drugs more affordable. Texas employers currently have — and need — the flexibility to cover new drugs, often less expensive generics or lower-priced brands, once available.

A new report prepared by the research firm Milliman found that “Frozen Formulary” legislation would increase Texas’ drug costs by $69 billion this year and $481 billion over the next five years.

Another proposal intends to prohibit Texas employers from implementing value-based contracting with pharmacies. The shift to pay-for-performance contracting is happening in all other health care delivery areas as Texas patients demand the most value for their hard-earned health care dollars. Pharmacies should be held to the same account.

The Texas Legislature also has proposed legislation prohibiting copay accumulators, a valuable tool used to expose big pharma’s market manipulation through coupons. The use of coupons prohibited by Medicare is simply a clever marketing tactic to protect market share and incentivize patients to take higher-priced name drugs when a lower-priced equivalent is available. By accounting for these costs, employers can provide overall lower-cost health plan options, meaning lower premiums for all participants.

These are difficult economic conditions, but Texas employers are committed to taking care of their employees by providing high-quality health care coverage that includes access to affordable prescription drugs. As small employers, we urge the legislature to pursue policies to reduce prescription drug costs by leveraging market forces that foster competition and lower drug costs.

Bill Hammond is the CEO of Texas Employers for Insurance Reform.

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Gary Scoggin

Not knowing Mr. Hammond’s background it’s hard to know his motivations, but I do agree that we should harness the free market and create performance incentives in healthcare as much as possible.

David Hardee

This issue of Drug prices was about to be addressed by the Trump administration. The cost of a drug in the USA was going to be set as that which was the lowest cost charged to ANY country. Then the pricing would be universal across all states.

The Biden administration has not addressed the issue. And if they do it will be most probable more FEDERAL control over every aspect of the individual's life.

Bailey Jones

lol. Trump gets credit for something that he didn't do. Biden gets blamed for something that hasn't happened.

Gary Scoggin

David... isn’t the plan you described FEDERAL control?

Welcome to the discussion.

Real Names required. No pseudonyms or partial names allowed. Stand behind what you post.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.