Galveston Bay oil spill cleanup

Workers look for contamination on the Texas City Dike in the aftermath of the Galveston Bay oil spill on Wednesday afternoon. A barge and a cargo ship collided near the Texas City Dike on March 22 causing a spill of more than 168,000 gallons of heavy fuel oil.

Since the spill occurred, our office has gotten multiple calls. Most who call want to know if they have a claim, and if so, how to engage in the process.

I intend here to give some basic background of oil spill law, and how the process works. If you have specific questions, consult your own lawyer.

The Oil Pollution Act — the OPA — was enacted in 1990 as a response to the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. In the Exxon Valdez litigation, it was unclear whether a nonfisherman could make a claim and could be compensated for the spill under the law, even though the oil hadn’t actually physically damaged his property.

The OPA answered that question, clearly. Now, under the OPA, a claimant who can show damage, whether oil was on the beach, and whether oil ever touched his property, has a valid claim.

Now, under the OPA, claimants can receive oil removal and cleanup expenses — even if the cleanup hasn’t yet occurred. A claimant can also recover expenses actually associated with oil damage to real or personal property, including damages associated with the inability to use their boat, dock or beach.

These claimants can also recover damages for the loss of value their property, even after it has been cleaned as best as it can be.

Further, under the OPA, a claimant can recover moneys associated with their inability to perform their water-related business — such as shrimp boat owners, or fishermen or crabbers.

This category would include damages for the catches being smaller than usual — or even nonexistent — or restrictions imposed as to where they can ply their trade. Typically, these are these individuals who suffer the most immediate damage, and also deal with the uncertainty of whether that damage will continue in the future.

The final category of claimants allowed under the OPA demonstrates why OPA law is so unique. The OPA allows restaurants, retail stores, hotels and other businesses to seek moneys for business interruption or loss of revenues as a result of the spill.

This category of claimants is typically the largest category of claimants, and the challenge here is to demonstrate that the lack of revenue is a result of the spill, and not some other reason.

A claimant under the OPA must document the claim, quantify it, and present it to the responsible party — in this case, Kirby Inland Marine, the company that spilled the oil. Upon receipt of the claim, the responsible party then has 90 days to act upon it.

If the responsible party doesn’t pay the claim, then suit can be filed in court. It is important to note that failure to present the claim to the responsible party prior to filing suit will result in the claim being dismissed by the court until presentment is accomplished.

The OPA is a powerful tool for those damaged by an oil spill; almost any type of business can recover under the act, if, and only if, they can demonstrate that the loss of revenue experience was a result of the spill.

Documentation and careful analysis of the claim is key in order to ensure the claim is paid in full.

Tony Buzbee, an attorney, has been involved in high-profile cases in Galveston County, including lawsuits against BP involving emissions at its Texas City refinery.

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Scott Toth

I hope the paper charged Buzbee for this unabashed solicitation and the his target audience remembers he's in it for himself not them.

Matt Coulson

Perhaps we could convince Tony to donate some of what he will make off this to the stadium renovation idea.

George Croix

With such hard and fast rules for compensation it makes one wonder why there's any need to give away 1/3 or more to a lawyer...

Centerpointe Moderator

The word Scottt is referencing is "advertorial".

Miceal O'Laochdha

OPA '90 a powerful tool? I guess that is true in the sense that a massive blunt instrument like a wreaking ball is a powerful tool.

OPA '90 was hysterical, knee-jerk, legislation quickly passed by ignorant and pandering legislators at the urging of the crowds of idiotic torch and pitchfork carrying villagers seeking the death of the Monster.

Mr. Buzbee's advertisement disguised as community-concern guest column only addresses that small portion of OPA '90 that supplies he and his brethren with the opportunities to make millions of OPM. There is a he!! of a lot more to this ridiculous and draconian law than that. One other portion of OPA '90 gave us the double hulled tanker requirements that sent scores of US Flag tankers to Indian, Pakistani and Chinese scrap yards many years before their time, costing thousands of US mariner and shipyard jobs, destroying old and honorable American shipping companies, as well as severely impacting our country's national security (in a BAD way).

So, the barge that spilled this oil was doubled-hulled. Didn't work out like the double plastic bags used to store extra pea soup before putting it in the freezer, after all.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.