Galveston residents have so much more because of people that don’t live here. Our access to health care through the University of Texas Medical Branch is way out of proportion to our resident population. We have more restaurants, more shopping, more activities, more arts, better beaches and better streets because of out-of-towners. The benefits to our resident community far outweigh any problems or issues we have with visitors, and the money that the city puts toward services and resources is proper and necessary. But after reading about the request to forgo revenues for Rosenberg Library, I’m not feeling the love for Galveston residents (“Galveston asks library to forgo part of a revenue windfall,” The Daily News, July 20).

There are just a few things that we can claim as residents of Galveston. Our school system is one, for example. Our parks are another. The Rosenberg Library is our most valued possession, and we want it fully supported with all the money to which it’s entitled. It’s ours, and we don’t want the city messing with its budget. The library isn’t a soft service to us. It’s essential to our quality of life in Galveston.

So much of our tax revenue goes to supporting our visitors. The more traveled streets get paved first, police and public safety officers concentrate on the tourist population on the seawall and The Strand. We have to pay for parking just like the tourists. Even the traffic lights on Broadway are timed for medical branch employees taking their money off the island. Residents don’t begrudge any of this. We complain a bit, but we understand the need.

But the Rosenberg Library directly supports our local community. It’s a community gem in a sea of T-shirt shops and fast food restaurants. It may be the best thing about our community. The quality and size of the library is also way out of proportion to our population. We’re so fortunate to have one of the greatest public libraries in the state here in our town. The collections and services, from children’s storytime and workshops, to book clubs for adults, to the history center are essential to the quality of life in this community.

I don’t know where the city will get the money it needs. You might have to cut tourist services, decrease the marketing budget or cut police presence on the seawall. I don’t know. It’s a hard choice. I do know that I will oppose any referendum that takes money away from the library, and I urge Mike Miller and the board of directors to resist reducing any revenue. The Rosenberg Library belongs to us. Leave it alone.

David Baca lives in Galveston.


Recommended for you

(9) comments

Lizzie Tish

Extremely well stated, Mr. Baca!!

Bailey Jones

[thumbup] The Rosenberg is, indeed, one of the island's treasures.

Ed Buckner

Well said, Mr. Jones. Ms. Tish, and especially, Mr. baca--a gem indeed.

Karen Alberstadt

Beautifully written.

Lewis Rosen

Absolutely a gem that should not be tarnished. Great article! Thank you sir.

Charlotte O'rourke

Excellent editorial. I enjoyed reading it. The library is a gem, and I’ve always envied librarians their jobs. With the state making a 3.5% cap on the city and the library having no cap, every year could be a revenue windfall for the library with the city going further and further in the hole for streets, drainage, safety, trash pickup etc.

The Library is ours but so is the city and it’s maintenance ours. I would like to see a question poll from the GDN on this issue.

If the Library Board signs the memorandum with the city or not, the issue should be addressed long-term. At this time the city can give more revenue, but not less than the $.05.

City Charter:

2) Effective January 1, 1979, for the conduct, maintenance, improvement and extension of Rosenberg Library, a tax rate which will yield that amount which would be derived by the levy of a Five Cent ($0.05) tax, or at the discretion of the City Council, an additional amount up to a maximum total of an Eight Cent ($0.08) tax, per $100.00 of assessed valuation based upon a one hundred (100) per cent assessment ratio.

Stephanie Martin

I agree with you 100%.

Charlotte O'rourke

I wanted to add that if the city is expected to stay (cap) at 3.5% (wouldn’t that be nice) one would expect entities (nonprofits) that the city funds to also be able to cap at that level. If the state changes the cap requirement then remove it from the entities like the Library that the city taxes funds as well.

Larry Grissom

Leave it alone. We make enough concessions as it is in Galveston due to tourism. Don’t cut funding to the library

Welcome to the discussion.

Real Names required. No pseudonyms or partial names allowed. Stand behind what you post.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.