One constant of indicted Attorney General Ken Paxton’s tenure in public office is there is no bottom, just newfound lows.

It’s bad enough the state’s top law enforcement official was indicted in 2015 on securities fraud, a dark cloud that hovers over Paxton and strains his credibility. But Paxton also is reportedly under federal investigation for using his office to support a campaign donor — allegations made by former staffers in the attorney general’s office.

These allegations raise important questions of character, or lack thereof. But Paxton also has demonstrated he is profoundly anti-democratic. He has the ignominy of leading the effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election, filing a garbage lawsuit — as described by one election law expert — to advance the baseless claim of widespread voter fraud in support of former President Donald Trump.

There was no widespread voter fraud, but Paxton has been consistent in his fervor to politicize this nonissue (the great voter fraud is the lie that widespread voter fraud occurred). His office’s election fraud case unit logged 22,000 staff hours in 2020 — and resolved 16 cases.

An American Civil Liberties Union analysis of voter fraud prosecutions pursued by Paxton’s office since 2015 found at least 72 percent of the cases were brought against Black and Latino defendants, and 45 percent were against Black and Latino women.

Given all of this — the sycophancy to Trump, the promotion of the Big Lie of voter fraud — it was no surprise Paxton attended the Jan. 6 “Save America Rally” that morphed into an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

But who paid for Paxton’s jaunt to Washington, D.C., for the rally? And with whom did Paxton communicate during the week of the insurrection? How did he react to the riot as it unfolded? Who booked him as a speaker?

These are the types of questions Texas journalists have been asking — questions Paxton refused to answer. It is so important to understand Paxton’s role in the “Save America Rally” that the San Antonio Express-News, Houston Chronicle, Dallas Morning News, Austin American-Statesman, ProPublica and the Texas Tribune are working together to obtain the relevant records to inform the public.

That’s proved problematic.

For starters, the news outlets have learned there is no policy to guide the release of work-related messages Paxton might send or receive on his personal devices — stunning since the attorney general’s office settles disputes over records requests involving other agencies and branches of government.

Who reviews Paxton’s messages for release? The attorney general’s office or Paxton? It’s unclear.

The Houston Chronicle and Dallas Morning News have requested all of Paxton’s messages for Jan. 5 through Jan. 11, but to no avail. A public information officer has said the records fall under confidential attorney-client privilege. Maybe, but it is hard to believe all his communications would be confidential. We could go on, but the point here is Paxton has no regard for the public’s right to know.

As he tweeted: “Triggered Texas Fake News Cartel strikes again. My office follows open records law. That’s our policy. These ‘journalists’ didn’t like what they got so they complain and spread misinformation. Pathetic.”

No, sir, what is pathetic is an elected official with such disregard for democracy and the public’s right to know. With each new low, Paxton only proves more unworthy of office.

• San Antonio Express-News editorial board

Michael A. Smith: 409-683-5206; michael.smith@galvnews.com

Recommended for you

(15) comments

Gary Scoggin

We get the government we deserve and Texas voters deserve a crook like Paxton.

Ron Binkley

The bottom line is that Paxton should be in jail, not in office.

Bailey Jones

[thumbup]

Carlos Ponce

The more you post against Paxton, the more likely he is going to win re-election if he chooses to run.

Gary Scoggin

Can you explain that comment, please, Carlos?

Carlos Ponce

Self explanatory. But here goes:

Gary Scoggin: Paxton bad!

Majority of Voters: We'll vote for Paxton.

Gary Scoggin

Just so I understand your post, the fact that I personally think Paxton is bad will motivate those otherwise not so inclined to go out and vote for him. Thanks for that very rational and logical explanation. It's all so clear now.

Jim Forsythe

"The more you post against Paxton, the more likely he is going to win re-election if he chooses to run." This explains why some are defending Trump, because they like people that run for office, to break the law. When someone post that the more bad things that a person does make them a more attractive candidate to them, you have to ask that person why?

Why would they want to vote for a person like that!

Mar. 24, 2021---A state judge has rejected a bid to dismiss a whistleblower lawsuit filed by four former executives at Attorney General Ken Paxton's office who said they were fired in retaliation after accusing their boss of misconduct.

Carlos Ponce

And with Jim's post, add more votes for Paxton.

Jim Forsythe

Why would they want to vote for a person like that!

Dan Freeman

Nice point: “Given all of this — the sycophancy to Trump, the promotion of the Big Lie of voter fraud — it was no surprise Paxton attended the Jan. 6 “Save America Rally” that morphed into an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.” But let’s keep in mind that those who defend Paxton are inflamed Trumpsters claiming the attempted coup was the same as “When Democrats questioned the election of Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush. …in the SAME MANNER.” President Jimmy Carter conceded to President-elect Ronald Reagan on November 5, 1980. Vice-President Al Gore conceded to President-elect George W. Bush on December 13, 2000. President Trump first urged a mob to march to the Capital to disrupt the Electoral College before conceding the next day.

The soon to be former President, eight Senators, and 139 congressmen attempted a coup that cost the lives of five people with more than 140 injured. The mob carrying iron clubs, bear spray, and crow bars threatened to lynch Vice President Mike Pence and stormed the capital building.

Capital Police risked their lives fighting the mob and rescued US Congress people and Senators from the floor of the Capital. Congress overwhelmingly voted to the honor bravery of these officers who saved the lives of the Vice President, the Senators, and the Congressmen. Twelve Republicans including three from Texas refused to honor the men and women who saved the Republic.

Never forget this day of infamy. This is not the same as a concession.

Carlos Ponce

" President Trump first urged a mob to march to the Capital to disrupt the Electoral College before conceding the next day."

As usual you ignore that President Trump asked them to be PEACEFUL.

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

Thomas Carpenter

"It's going to be wild!" That's what the disgraced former president told his foot soldiers.

Ted Gillis

He only said that once. Count the times he encouraged violence.

Carlos Ponce

In Ted's mind, even cheerleaders encourage violence - "GO, FIGHT, WIN!

Welcome to the discussion.

Real Names required. No pseudonyms or partial names allowed. Stand behind what you post.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.