Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s reluctance to issue a statewide shelter-in-place order is understandable, on one hand. On the other, and in context to what he and other leaders in state government were saying fairly recently, it’s amazing.

At a news conference Sunday, Abbott declined to follow the lead of other states with a statewide shelter-in-place order. But he warned Texans that it could be coming if they don’t heed his previous orders on Friday that limited social gatherings to under 10 people, closed schools, bars and gyms and banned dine-in eating at restaurants.

“Stricter standards will be taken, if necessary,” Abbott said. “If you don’t have an essential reason for leaving your home, you should not be leaving your home.”

There are several good arguments for allowing cities and counties to decide for themselves whether to, and to what extent, they should attempt to restrict movement and the general right to gather as people see fit.

Texas is a big state with many differences from place to place, including population densities and the level of reliance on public transportation.

What makes perfect sense in Harris, Tarrant, Travis and Galveston counties might not make any sense at all in Brewster and Pecos counties, where social distancing comes with the territory.

There might well be some virtue in not kicking every leg from under the economy everywhere all at the same time.

Meanwhile, many local governments have responded in ways local leaders argue are necessary and proper for their own jurisdictions.

Galveston, where thousands of tourists flow in and out like the tides, took steps early to close bars, tourist venues and other gathering places, to restrict access to the public beaches and to restrict restaurants to take-out and delivery services only.

Other cities in the county have, so far, taken fewer such steps and took them later. Still others as recently as Monday had taken none.

It’s very safe bet, almost a certainty, that all the local elected officials who made those hard decisions, issuing orders that will undermine the economic health of their communities and constituents in hopes of protecting their physical health, would have loved to have something sooner and something more than the suggestions the governor has managed so far.

It would have given them some political cover and provided a unified message.

If ever there was a time when the state of Texas could have been justified in assuming control over local authority, this was it. Instead, the governor chose to urge and suggest, leaving the hard work of deciding to mayors and county judges.

That might have been absolutely the right thing to do.

If, however, it was right thing during a global health crisis, it will still be the right thing when this crisis has passed.

What Abbott is relying on to work now during this state of emergency is the same “patchwork of local regulations” he was lamenting a few years ago when he argued elected city and county leaders couldn’t be trusted to regulate such things as single-use plastic bags, ride-hailing companies, short-term-rental operations, fracking and their own tax rates.

Perhaps in this crisis the governor has found a renewed respect for local control of local affairs and will stand down the assault on those concepts he had helped lead for at least two legislative sessions.

Whatever the case might be, the bottom line is that if local governments can be trusted to deal with COVID-19, they can be trusted to deal with everything else.

• Michael A. Smith

Michael A. Smith: 409-683-5206; michael.smith@galvnews.com

Recommended for you

(8) comments

Allison Buchtien

Ah irony! Same could be said when the state doesn't like the federal government tells them to do something.

Carlos Ponce

Check the US Constitution, Amendment 10.

Gary Scoggin

Unfortunately, the Tenth Amendment has been eviscerated by the Interstate Commerce Clause.

Ray Taft

Smith wrote: “...they can be trusted to deal with everything else.” This means The Daily News has blanket trust in the government no matter what the government does, no matter what rights they abuse.

There used to be a time when the press stood with the people against an abusive government. But now the press joins with the government to oppress the people.

President Trump is right the media is the enemy of the people.

Gary Scoggin

While I am happy to gee him join the local control crowd, I think Gov. Abbot’s sudden love for this is motivated by a desire not to be held accountable if things go South.

Wayne D Holt

I think you will find in human affairs as in nature, there is a point beyond which centralization of resources and decision making increases the likelihood of large-scale disasters.

We have to learn the hard way that hyperspecialization is a two-edge sword. Efficiency and cost cutting can go way up with it but so does the risk of catastrophic damage if your supply lines are affected. Same is true of political organization. While local control may give you a patchwork of regulations, it also gives you flexibility and resiliency and a chance to let the free market decide what works and what doesn't.

Right now I disagree with how local government has handled this situation so far, but I still think we are better off with it this way than state-wide mandates. I also applaud the county for taking an approach the devolves responsibility to the most grassroots level of government we can.

Integration and coordination of efforts voluntarily is fantastic. But when you have fewer and fewer leaders making the decisions for more and more people, you are setting yourself up for mistakes that when they inevitably happen, happen to everyone at once and make bouncing back from them very difficult indeed.

Paul Sivon

Governor Abbott will defer to local control when convenient, and he’ll fight against it when he wishes. An expectation of logical consistency is misplaced.

Carlos Ponce

There is an expectation of following the US Constitution and the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas. And Governor Abbott will follow and obey each not as "he wishes" but in adherence to those laws and constitutions.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.