Life always is more difficult for the poor. Life in a pandemic that has caused many millions of people to lose their jobs under severe and open-ended lockdowns and restrictions has proved even more so, particularly for children.

Last week, The Daily News reported about the difficult choices parents faced when deciding whether to choose in-person school or remote learning for their children during the lingering coronavirus pandemic.

But the fact is, some parents didn’t have real choices.

“Parents of means can always find ways to educate their children, whether by enrolling them in private school or hiring tutors,” Jenin Younes, a public defender in New York City wrote earlier this month in an article titled “What’s Gone Wrong with Left-Liberalism and Lockdowns” for the conservative American Institute for Economic Research.

“But for working-class and poor parents, who do not have those options, and cannot afford a laptop per child, the continued school shutdown is an epic disaster.”

In some circles, it’s taboo or considered callous or morally bankrupt to question the logic of blanket lockdowns or to suggest thoughtfully weighing risks as we try to navigate and understand this pandemic.

“Anyone who dares suggest we have overreacted to the threat of coronavirus, and in doing so, have caused more harm than the disease itself, is accused of being a grandma-killer, a fascist and worse,” Younes wrote.

What’s callous and morally bankrupt is to conveniently overlook the plight of millions of people who are deprived of education or means to make a living, pushing them toward economic ruin, homelessness, ill health and despair.

In an Aug. 24 article titled, “New Thinking on COVID Lockdowns: They’re Overly Blunt and Costly,” The Wall Street Journal reported the equivalent of 400 million jobs have been lost worldwide, 13 million in the United States alone.

Researchers interviewed for the article consider ways to balance saving jobs and educating children, while protecting vulnerable populations, noting the virus is especially deadly for the elderly, particularly in nursing homes.

Their conclusions offered a less frightening picture of opening schools.

“By contrast, fewer children have died this year from COVID-19 than from flu,” according to the article. “And studies in Sweden, where most schools stayed open, and the Netherlands, where they reopened in May, found teachers at no greater risk than the overall population.

“This suggests reopening schools outside of hot spots, with protective measures, shouldn’t worsen the epidemic, while alleviating the toll on working parents and on children.”

If schools don’t reopen until January, low-income children will have lost a year of education, which translates to 4 percent lower lifetime earnings, consulting firm McKinsey & Co. told the Wall Street Journal.

“Teachers, administrators, and parents have worked hard to keep learning alive; nevertheless, these efforts are not likely to provide the quality of education that’s delivered in the classroom,” according to McKinsey & Co.’s June 1 report.

“Even more troubling is the context: the persistent achievement disparities across income levels and between white students and students of Black and Hispanic heritage. School shutdowns could not only cause disproportionate learning losses for these students — compounding existing gaps — but also lead more of them to drop out.

“This could have long-term effects on these children’s long-term economic well-being and on the U.S. economy as a whole.”

With some hindsight and more understanding every day about COVID-19, it’s time for more open and honest — and less partisan and ideological — debate about how governments and schools should react. Clearly, less politics and more pragmatism is needed.

We thank the educators in Galveston County who have understood this all along, striving to provide in-school education to thousands of students safely with careful precautions in place for students and employees. We also implore them to resist overreacting when cases arise at campuses, as they invariably will, and make the decision to close schools as one of last resort.

• Laura Elder

 Laura Elder: 409-683-5248;


Recommended for you

(4) comments

Bailey Jones

COVID has been a financial boon for still employed homeowners and people who own stocks, a tragedy for the poor and unemployed, and of course the children suffer the most. The pandemic has effectively torn every weak spot in our social fabric. I wish I could believe that there will be lessons learned.

Wayne D Holt


Gary Miller

Schools were closed, are closed, will remain closed because the Teachers Union thinks it helps Democrats in the election. Damage to children is not important to the unions. Actually unions think a poorer education helps liberals. AS evidence they have poorly educated voters in inner city's where the worst education has produced decades of Democrat rule. Before unions got control US education was rated the worlds best and the lowest cost. Under union rule US education is now rated 40th or less and the most costly. As costs increase quality declines.

Wayne D Holt

Thank you, Laura, for another reality check regarding the all-in costs of current and future efforts to overcome the effects of Covid-19. Those who were barely staying afloat before the virus hit have been handed a whole new set of problems to face in making ends meet and even making sure their children don't fall behind the educational attainments of better off peers

I know a couple who are middle class with a fourth grader. The distance learning has been worrisome to them even with adequate resources and mom at home. Can you imagine the stress on those having to deal with the complications of providing their children's education when they are supposed to be at work--if they even have a job now?

The single greatest lesson we as citizens must take from this entire tragic episode in American life is that handing over decision-making in an emergency to a political class whose great fear is to be seen as not doing SOMETHING is a huge mistake. At a time when small/medium businesses should have been at the table, when educators and youth leaders should have been consulted about potential effects, the switch was thrown, and we were left to deal with the consequences.

This did not have to happen. Anyone who tells you "the virus" was responsible for this wake of destruction is either gullible or culpable. We as a society make decisions through our representatives, but we should never blindly assume their decisions are always the best informed, or sacrosanct.

We need government that is, top to bottom, one of participation by the people of all social strata. The era of the expert, of the not to be questioned authority, is over. It's time for a rethinking about how we are to govern ourselves.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.