It’s an interesting apparent paradox coming as the Texas Legislature prepares to meet next year. You can expect to hear the continued clamor about property tax reform, but, at the same time, lawmakers are heading into the session looking at a projected drop in the state’s share of public eduction funding because of rising local property taxes.

Earlier this week, the Texas Education Agency projected a drop in the state’s general revenue for public education by more than $3.5 billion over the next two years, in part because the revenue from local property taxes is expected to skyrocket. General revenue only makes up part of the state’s education funding.

Historically, the state has relied on rising local property taxes sent to Austin to fund increased education costs. In 2008, local revenue accounted for $18.2 billion in public education funding, not including higher education. The state aid was slightly higher at $18.24 billion.

Since then, state spending has remained relatively flat, peaking at $20.9 billion in 2016 and declining back to $19.6 billion in 2017. Local revenue has, though, grown to $26.2 billion in 2017, according to the Legislative Budget Office. If the education agency’s projections hold true, the local share could skyrocket to nearly $30 billion over the next two years.

In his campaign position to reform the property tax system, among other ideas, Gov. Greg Abbott addressed the school funding system.

“The state has, for too long, relied on the rapid growth of school district property tax collections to fund increases in public education spending.”

But, as Abbott noted, reforming the property tax could have an effect on the so-called Robin Hood system of financing education. In the 2016-17 school year, $1.7 billion was paid under the recapture formula school districts deemed wealthy.

A key of his plan would be to put a cap on property tax revenue. But, as he noted, a “property tax revenue cap would likely have the effect of reducing recapture payments because it would reduce the growth of school district property taxes across the board.”

In its initial meetings earlier this year, the School Finance Commission established during the last legislative session included property taxes as part of school finance reform. How much of that discussion will end up in the commission’s final report to the legislature remains to be seen. It also remains to be seen how much of Abbott’s campaign position makes its way into serious discussion when lawmakers convene early next year.

The reality, though, is that meaningful property tax reform cannot be achieved without meaningful school finance reform.

In the past, though, lawmakers have had a poor track record of addressing those issues, either singularly or together.

• Dave Mathews

Dave Mathews: 409-683-5258;

Managing Editor — Design

(6) comments

Ray Taft

If the reality is that meaningful property tax reform cannot be achieved without meaningful school finance reform, then let’s add transparency to the mix.

Let’s really get real.

Every school district should be transparent with how they really spend tax dollars so that taxpayers can really see where their money really goes. Start by listing school and administration staff positions by salary. No names just the positions, what it pays and what they do there.

Then open the books on programs. Let’s really see what is being spent on those as opposed to the real task of educating Texas’ children.

Seeing how school districts really spend our money would really be meaningful.

Jose' Boix

TCISD Posted Budget Information:

George Croix

And meaningful school finance reform cannot be achieved without some control over the unpredictable numbers of ever increasing students who should not even be in the schools.
No border control means no school finance control. And therein lies the paradox of anyone who would argue the need for school finance reform while so many of the same folks also advocate for open or nearly so borders.

There it is.....

Gary Miller

State charter schools only educate slightly better than ISD schools. A slight improvement in education could be achieved by converting all state supported schools to charter schools. The financial savings could be used to double teachers pay while replacing poor teachers with great teachers. Would also eliminate ' Robin hood'.

Carlos Ponce

There's something wrong when some Texas ISDs spend millions on stadiums and water parks while others do without.
Water parks? See "La Joya ISD opens first school-owned water park in state of Texas" First and LAST I hope.
"La Joya is considered a 'poor' district by state standards. In one index that puts a number of how expensive it is to teach kids, it's at the top."

Jose' Boix

The problem will continue. My premise is that our academic experts have lost track of what is the basic education needs - define what makes a successful high school graduate. Then, once that is defined, a price can be developed. The financial quandary revolves in trying to patch, add, cut, etc. funding to a basically flawed system and process. We also continue to create committees to study to "problem" and time is just moving on; there is no direction and no leadership to boot. Just my thoughts.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for Reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.