You have to admire League City Councilman Keith Gross’ willingness to stand on principal, but sometimes the higher principal is saving public dollars by following the path of least resistance.

That’s what the city council did in a special meeting Thursday by agreeing to settle a lawsuit with Mark Rohr, the former city manager fired in December 2016.

About a week ago, Gross, who’s leaving office in January, had thwarted a similar effort to settle the lawsuit by arguing that it simply wasn’t right to do so.

“The lawsuit says his speech caused us to fire him,” Gross said a week ago. “I can assure you, nobody fired him because of his speech. It was because of his inability to work with the council as a whole in the past and future.

“If we approve this settlement, in the newspaper it will say that the city settles its lawsuit with Rohr. He’ll feel vindicated.”

League City can’t settle every lawsuit just because it might be cheaper than standing up and doing the right thing, Gross said.

Shortly after Gross’ comments, the council split a vote 3-3 on whether to settle the lawsuit. Gross and council members Hank Dugie and Greg Gripon opposed the settlement, Mayor Pat Hallisey abstained and Councilman Nick Long was absent.

Gross was dead-on in his assessment of the situation. The council fired Rohr because he got into a war with the mayor, not because he spoke his mind.

Rohr’s firing came after months of open fighting with Hallisey. Rohr in September 2016 accused Hallisey of breaching the city’s charter by discussing an economic development prospect that was supposed to be confidential and violating the city’s council-manager form of government, in which the city manager runs day-to-day operations.

The bottom line, however, is that letting Rohr think what he wants to think, and tell potential employers a story in which he’s the victim, is better than spending huge sums of public money to make a point that is ultimately beside the point.

That’s not to say the city solved the problem at no cost.

Rohr will receive a total of $145,000 as part of the settlement agreement, with $45,000 of that coming from the city itself and the additional $100,000 paid through insurance funding, said Sarah Greer Osborne, spokeswoman for the city.

The council in 2016 already voted to pay Rohr a severance package of $158,602, plus a performance incentive pay of $40,000 and an accrued vacation pay of $18,506.

That all adds up to more than $400,000, which is no small sum of money. It’s a pittance, however, compared to what protracted litigation might have cost.

Gross was right that there was no justice in having to pay a lot of money to settle the lawsuit, but the council was more right in cutting its potential losses and just moving on.

• Michael A. Smith

Michael A. Smith: 409-683-5206;


(4) comments

Michelle Aycoth

Let the future frivolous lawsuits begin !!
Andrew Aycoth

Rusty Schroeder

This guy got $360K, a vacation, and a new job after getting fired from his previous job, twice. League City needs to do a little bit more research on the people they hire, this guy took them to the cleaners while already being damaged goods.

Marc Edelman

We in League City need to hold the council accountable that hurriedly hired him without regard for his behavior at his two previous positions as city manager at other cities. It was right there for all of us to see. One of the clues was a thoroughly prepared report that outlined what went wrong in Joplin in the Rohr regime All available for any child to see with google. Our employment agreements should be written by our attornies not the job applicant. There are still a few on council who have the hiring of Rohr on their voting records. They would like us all to forget their prior bad deeds performed while working with Mr Rohr, and bad the bad deeds they performed against our current Mayor. They would like us all to fagetaboutit! Keith Grosse to my knowledge is the only one to publicly admit it hat there was a conspiracy to malign the mayor’s reputation, and he publicly apologized for it.

Chuck DiFalco

I both admire and support those councilmembers who vote, like Mr. Gross just did, based on personal principles rather than expediency.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for Reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.