GALVESTON

Two months after closing the public comment period for a plan to build a storm-surge barrier along the Texas coast, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is about 90 percent finished sorting through the more than 6,000 written comments it received about the proposed project that would be the largest civil works project in U.S. history, officials said.

The work, which includes categorizing and responding to each of the comments so they can be put into a final report to be presented to Congress when it’s complete in 2021, is part of the normal process for a project being undertaken by the corps, said Kelly Burks-Copes, the project manager for the barrier.

But even as the normal work of the corps project progresses, state and local officials were meeting in Washington D.C. this week to discuss whether and how the corps can deviate from its normal procedures in reaction to the public feedback the barrier project received.

At the top of their list was the question of how the corps might hold a second round of public meetings about the project, Burks-Copes said.

“At this point, I can’t tell you for sure that we’re going to be having the second public review comment period, because that’s part of what the meeting is this week,” Burks-Copes said. “We’re evaluating it and proposing and taking a schedule to our chief commander this week that talks about how we could incorporate public comments into revisions of the plan and also how we might go about having a second public review comment period.”

The Galveston corps office needs permission from higher-ranking offices within the corps before it can move ahead with a second public hearing and comment period, she said. She didn’t know when the corps might make a final decision on the hearings, although it could come within a week, she said.

“It’s not a normal procedure to have a second public review period,” she said.

But given that the coastal spine proposal would be the largest civil works project in U.S. history, irregular procedures might not be surprising.

After three years of internal study and development, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers revealed its draft plan for a coastal barrier in November. The plan called for 70 miles of barriers and floodgates along the coast on Galveston Island and Bolivar Peninsula, as well as along the western edge of Galveston Bay. It featured a massive floodgate between the island and the peninsula, a ring levee around much of Galveston Island and ecosystem restoration projects up and down the Texas Coast. The project is estimated to cost up to $31 billion.

Similar barrier plans have been pitched and talked about for years as a way to protect the Houston region from massively damaging storm surges that can occur during a hurricane. But as details about the corps’ plan emerged, Galveston County residents and property owners began to question the wisdom of the project.

On Bolivar Peninsula in particular, a vocal group of residents protested the possibility that the barrier could be built along state Highway 87 and leave beach homes between the wall and the Gulf of Mexico. On Galveston Island, the proposal of a ring levee, which would protect the backside of island from surges, was met with similar objection.

Corps officials said placement of the barriers had not been finalized, although critics pointed to mapping data the corps used to draw up its proposal as the source of their fears.

In December, Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush called on the corps to develop a plan that places the barrier at the dune line, which would protect most homes in the area from storm surges.

The General Land Office is the corps’ partner in the coastal barrier study.

On Wednesday, Burks-Copes said that the next time a draft plan is released, it will include an analysis of barriers — both seawalls and more dune-like structures — placed along the dune line, and what the benefits and risks of such a placements would be.

There are other measures being considered in response to the public meetings. The land office intends to start recruiting local people to be members of “working groups,” whose members can take questions to state and local officials, and take information back to concerned neighbors, General Land Office spokeswoman Karina Erickson said.

“It’s very much a work in progress for us to be better able to communicate with the community with regard to what’s going on with the Coastal Texas Study,” Erickson said. “I think it was clear to us that, regardless of the public outreach that had been conducted prior to the release of the first draft of the study, that the public was not fully aware of what the entire plan was looking like.”

John Wayne Ferguson: 409-683-5226; john.ferguson@galvnews.com or on Twitter @johnwferguson.

Locations

(8) comments

Randy Chapman

[thumbup]It will happen...

Susan Fennewald

The proposed project is a financial mess and all fiscally responsible taxpayers should oppose it - or at least ask for better financial accounting. As it now stands, it proposes spending $20 billion dollars to save $10 billion in damages from a storm. Does that make sense?

Randy Chapman

$10 billion? Ok, and that's if it only protects against one storm. So far, the much smaller Texas City levee has protected Texas City and Lamarque against two hurricanes, Alicia and Ike. Harvey wasn't a landfalling system here but had the wall been in place, it could have been closed before Harvey's storm tides raised the level of the bay to a point that it could no longer accecpt any appreciable runoff from the torrential rainfall. So, I think your figure of protecting the bay vs doing nothing is a bit short-sighted.

Susan Fennewald

No - it will not be fiscally responsible. Read the Corps report - especially appendix E - the economic segment. They do the calculations based on probability of a storm etc etc. The only segment of the plan that makes financial sense is the ring levee barrier to protect the city of Galveston from flooding. The rest of the plan is a total waste of money.

Rusty Schroeder

Ike Dike Coastal Spine Barrier Wall Dream Catcher, missed you for almost 2 weeks, Welcome Back ……… you endless study and revisions.

Jarvis Buckley

"The largest civil works project in US
history."
Only one person could make this happen. Under budget & on schedule. President Donald J. Trump.

Jarvis Buckley

Susan this project will cost so much more than the projections. It's going to be the worst boondoggle in US history . Kinda like the California
railroad project.
Notice how the housing projects are
Progressing! Notice how the rollover pass project is progressing. This
Coastal Barrier is more than likely just a hole politicians pour money in.
"Our Money". Not practical.

George Croix

Two years still to go to to produce and deliver a report to Congress summarizing the 'input'....then, how many more years for Congress, whichever Congress it happens to be, Friendly to Texas or Not, to read it over, ask for clarifications and updates, which will lead to more consulting and meetings, and more reports, then .......and so on.
Then, the lawsuits and delaying tactics of the NIMBYS and 'activists' will start IF the money is ever even appropriated to start construction, all before a single 'shovel ready' spade fo dirt is turned....
That LAST part was NOT in play when the TC Levee was started, and it wasn't for most of the 25 years it took to finish that one fairly small by comparison project.
Do have to admire the level of optimism in this area though......

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for Reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.