Students returning to Santa Fe High School in August will enter through a newly constructed and tightly secured front lobby district officials hope would protect against future shooting attacks.

The Santa Fe Independent School District Board of Trustees voted Tuesday to spend about $1.5 million on a series of security updates at the high school. It’s the first major approval of renovations since a May 18 shooting left 10 people dead and another 13 injured inside the high school.

“We want to get as many as these hardening things done as we can before school starts,” board President J.R. “Rusty” Norman said.

The vote came against a backdrop of growing frustration among residents. Even as the board was completing its meeting, more than 100 people were meeting at Santa Fe City Hall to discuss their concern about the district’s process of upgrading security and raising the possibility of replacing some school board members in November’s election.

The lobby security vestibule will cost up to $250,000 to build, officials said. It will allow students and others to enter only a lobby area without being buzzed in by a school staff member inside a nearby office.

That staff member will be behind a window coated with a “bullet-resistant glaze,” officials said.

The board also approved spending up to $650,000 to demolish and renovate the part of the high school where the shooting took place, officials said. Two art classrooms will be demolished, and a new hallway will be constructed through part of the school, so students can avoid that section.

Some classes will be moved to accommodate the renovation, and the space marked for demolition won’t be used, officials said.

The district also will replace door locks around the high school, allowing classrooms to be locked from the inside, and replace the fire alarms with an upgraded system allowing teachers to activate panic alarms from inside classrooms, officials said.

The district plans to have many of the renovations completed by the beginning of the school year on Aug. 21. But some items, including the bullet-proofed window and the alarm system, might not be completed until after the school year begins, Norman said.

“There will be other changes after school starts,” Norman said.

The school voted down a proposal to install a 6-foot-tall fence around the high school campus and to limit vehicle access. The fence would have cost about $180,000.

“We’re very much in tune with the community and the parents of the school district and overwhelmingly they did not want that,” Trustee Sheryl Skufca said.

A fence might have been more of a security risk than an improvement, she said.

“With fences, students would not have been able to get out the way they did,” she said.

The renovations are the first physical improvement the school board has approved since the shooting, although other security measures already had been announced.

A $39 million budget passed June 25 funded five new police officers and five new security guards. The district also approved money for weapons, vehicles and other equipment for those new positions.

Officials have promised more mental health counselors at the high school.

For some parents, the two-month process to get to Tuesday’s votes was long and frustrating. At the city hall meeting, parents discussed their feelings about perceived inaction by school officials, both in addressing security in future and in dealing with past complaints about bullying and other issues.

The group resolved to carry out its own survey about what people wanted to see as far as security updates. That survey would be passed on to the district, Mark Bratcher, parent of a high schooler, who helped lead and organize the meeting, said.

“We want the community to give them information,” Bratcher said. “This is what the community wants, this is what we want implemented.”

Some residents have been skeptical about the district’s own safety committee, which meets in private and was selected by the administration after an application period. The concerns have been amplified because at least one of the members of the safety committee, school board Trustee Patrick Kelly, has been cool to the idea of installing metal detectors.

The group was interested in recruiting people to run for school board positions in the fall, Bratcher said.

Some people at the parents meeting said they were pleased Norman and Superintendent Leigh Wall had attended the meeting and listened to their concerns.

More votes are expected. The district’s safety and security committee plans to meet Thursday, when it might submit recommendations to the school board.

Another special meeting will be held Monday, Norman said.

John Wayne Ferguson: 409-683-5226; or on Twitter @johnwferguson.


Senior Reporter

(6) comments

Ed Matthews

Classroom doors will be designed to lock from the inside? Would this be considered a Fire Hazard?

Carlos Ponce

From the National Fire Protection Association:
"Classroom door locking against unwanted entry"
"There is a criterion requiring the unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door to be accomplished without the use of a key or tool, and without any special knowledge or effort. For installation of locking hardware on new doors, the releasing mechanism must open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation. For example, hardware that releases both the latch and the deadbolt via a single operation of the door lever might be used. For installation of locking hardware on existing doors, the releasing mechanism must open the door leaf with not more than two releasing operations. This relaxation of the traditional single-operation requirement applicable to egress doors is offered in recognition of what is practical to achieve without replacing the door."

George Croix

Emergency exit 'panic bars' for locked doors, operable by anyone inside wanting to get out, have been around forever. They're required by fire code just about everywhere a group of people can be expected to be.

Jose' Boix

Find it intriguing the absence of references to a commitment by the Staff and Trustees to enforce the rules and policies; including dress code (having uniforms would be best), having visible ID Badges for all at all times, a system to manage head-count and of visitors in the buildings at all times. As an aside, I have not heard of considering the use of "chipped ID Badges" to enable entry to school and other campus areas. Just my thoughts.

Carlos Ponce

Chipped ID badges were tried at SFHS in 2010.

From 2013-2014 SFISD Student Code of Conduct:
"Photo IDs – RFID Each student is required to wear an ID around their neck during the school day. If a student does not have his/her ID, they will be required to purchase a temporary ID for $1.00 or a replacement badge for $15.00"

SFISD School Board Minutes August 18, 2014
B.Mike Wade and Ringo Tseng with Wade-Garcia & Associates, Inc., gave a
presentation of a new RFID badge prototype. They would like SFISD to
try out the new design at the same cost as the old badges. These badges would be for teachers and principals only. They have panic buttons for emergency’s, which would send an e-mail to a designated location for immediate assistance.
Mr. Rothermel made a motion to approve the renewal contract for 1 year with
Wade-Garcia & Associates, Inc., for the software and maintenance of the RFID
badging system. Mr. Norman seconded and all voted in favor.

SFISD Board Agenda September 28, 2015
J. Consider and Approve RFID 2015-2016 Service and Support Renewal

"Santa Fe uses radio frequency tracking badges"

"Tracking devices in school badges raise concerns"

"Student I.D. tracking devices spark parent protest"

"Students will be tracked via chips in IDs"

Use of RFID ID badges led to suspensions for students who refused to wear them and lawsuits in other schools.

Jim Forsythe

You may want to check it out.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for Reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.