(2) comments Back to story

Don Ciaccio

I agree 100%. Only those that pay premiums should be entitled to payouts. The rest can move away or save up for the next flood. Why should I pay to cover those that CHOOSE not to have insurance. This is ridiculous.

Steve Fouga

I have to agree with Don233 on this one.

If a person is in a flood zone, they should have flood insurance.

That insurance should be affordable in the same sense that any insurance is -- meaning that while a person may not enjoy paying it, they are able to fit it within a household budget commensurate with the property they own.

If a person can't afford both the property and the insurance policies to protect it, they should buy a lesser property. And moving forward, the government should not impose unaffordable insurance rates on people who already own property.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.