To Jean Casanave the PAC that should actually be called the Citizens "Against" CCISD or against community growth, you are just wrong ("Vote 'no' May 6 on CCID bond," The Daily News, April 17).

I'm curious as to how many members, including Jean, have attended any of the forums conducted by the school district or toured the facilities that need renovations? I'm willing to bet that it is not that many or they may be able to see the need for these funds.

So many elementary schools are so overcrowded an entire grade is forced into portables. This bond will provide funding to build a much needed elementary school to help alleviate overcrowding. This school district is part of a rapid growth spurt in League City and adjoining towns and like it or not, it is 2017 not 1947, when, I suspect, a lot of the opponents were last in school.

This is a much-needed bond proposal that most definitely will benefit the community and the children growing up within it. So have an open mind and don't follow in lockstep with those whose myopic visions clutter their outlook on the world around them.

David F. Smith

League City 

Locations

(1) comment

Doyle Beard

What real evidence supports the vote no on the
CCISD Bond election?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.