Shawn Phillips' guest column "Told you Lonnie Cox is a bad judge" (The Daily News, Feb. 1) says Cox is dishonest, corrupt, a bad judge and probably criminal. Wow. He is entitled to his opinion — but that does not make it true.

If the lawsuit was "frivolous," the trial court could have dismissed it with prejudice.

Personally, I feel the judges should control hiring of court administrators. Real issues — who controls hiring, firing and budget for court personnel — were present and appealed. Losing does not equal frivolity. As to why someone would show up in court knowing of the alleged "inappropriate relationship between Cox and Stevens," I can suggest three: avoid a default judgement, assert one's rights and ask for the judge to recuse himself.

I assume if Phillips knew of any corrupt consideration given for the bargain legal fee, he would gleefully provide it. I am willing to see what the district attorney and bar association have to say.

For the record, I do not know Cox or Stevens, or have legal matters before with them; however, I do know a hatchet job when I see one.

Victor Rogosa

League City

Locations

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for Reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.