The rise of the tea party has splintered the Republican Party to such an extent that it acts like the antebellum Democratic Party.

In opposing Abraham Lincoln, Democrats pursued narrow agendas rather than victory and good governance. Lincoln’s election with a mere 41 percent of the popular vote was assured by extremists and racists splitting their votes among three candidates.

Unionist Republicans won the next 11 elections, except for the anomalous Grover Cleveland.

William Howard Taft returned to the old-fashioned roots of the party. His abandonment of Theodore Roosevelt’s progressive policies assured Woodrow Wilson’s win in 1912 with only 42 percent of the vote. Republicans returned to office in 1920 and governed until the economic collapse of 1929 led to Franklin Roosevelt’s election and re-elections.

President Harry Truman desegregated the armed forces in 1948. Later that year, Democrats adopted a strong civil rights platform over the objections of Southern Democrats.

In response, Gov. Strom Thurmond fashioned the States’ Rights Democratic Party — the Dixiecrats — to oppose President Truman and defend segregation. Thurmond’s candidacy erased some of the perceived stains of racism from the national Democratic Party.

The party’s embrace of civil rights and Thurmond’s explicit racism motivated a large turnout by African-Americans, thereby assuring Truman’s election.

Republicans united, behind Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, to take back the White House in 1952 and retain it in 1956. Led by Richard Nixon, they nearly retained the presidency in 1960.

After two humiliating defeats, Nixon regrouped and revised his strategy between 1962 and 1968.

Two pivotal policies drove Nixon’s return to power. The first was that any Republican was better than a Democrat. He campaigned vigorously for Republicans in the intervening years, which dramatically increased the likelihood of party victories.

Nixon’s second policy was to lure the South from the Democratic Party. Nixon strategist Kevin Phillips argued that African-American votes were irrelevant, if the South could be won. This “Southern Strategy” evolved directly from the Dixiecrats. Sadly, it worked as Republicans began sweeping Southern politics by appealing to our reactionary tendencies.  

I believe wise political strategy relies on outreach and strong forward-looking programs. The only reason for a political party is governance. If a party wants to govern, it must accommodate diversity to win.

Bill Clinton and Barack Obama unified the Democratic Party and built inclusive constituencies in order to govern the country.  

Today, Republicans obsess over attracting “the right kind of people.” Witness the notion of a Republican in Name Only (RINO).

This has led to a series of litmus tests: guns (for it), legal abortion (against it), prayer in school (for it), immigration reform (against it), and so forth. The obsession produces a finer and finer vetting in quest for the “perfect candidate” to run under the Republican banner.  

As political parties have proved with their tumultuous histories, there is no perfect candidate.

Today reactionaries, such as Dan Patrick, David Brat and Ted Cruz, shatter the Grand Old Party as it yields to demands for narrowly defined political purity. “History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme,” attributed to Mark Twain.

Dan Freeman is retired and lives in Galveston.

Dan Freeman is retired and lives in Galveston.

(3) comments

Carlos Ponce

You call Dan Patrick, David Brat and Ted Cruz "reactionaries". I call them "Great Americans". If the Republican party nominates a TRUE Conservative for president in 2016 that candidate will win. Both John McCain and Mitt Romney were decent gentlemen but hardly Conservative, hence their loss in the General election. Now the media is trying to push Chris Christie on us

George Croix

Axctually, it was sounding pretty reasonable and making some good points, until I got to the part claiming that Barack Obama is governing the country.
No. Governing required consensus and compromise and inclusiveness.
Even Bill Clinton eventually 'got it', and went down that path.
Barack Obama's directing the country unilaterally and ideologically.
One would think a Constitutional scholar would not be so predisposed to ignore it so often.

Chris Gimenez

"Bill Clinton and Barack Obama unified the Democratic Party and built inclusive constituencies in order to govern the country.
Today, Republicans obsess over attracting “the right kind of people.” Witness the notion of a Republican in Name Only (RINO)."

Dan, the only thing Bill Clinton and Hussein Obama have done is to further divide this country based on race and economics. The "inclusive constituencies" you so incorrectly describe as part of the Entitlement Party is really nothing more than the gestapo-like control by Harry Reid over any dissenting views by members of their party. Promising to take care of someone from cradle-to-grave isn't a recipe either for what made this country great or what will reclaim our greatness after eight years of the most destructive, U.S.-hating president this country's ever seen.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.