Some pictures tell more than one story. The one accompanying this editorial, which shows the outrageous state of the city’s recycling center the Saturday before Easter — tells at least two. 

The first goes like this: All the candidates hoping to be elected May 12 to various spots on the City Council said the island needs a good, old-fashion cleaning up. It’s a bread-and-butter sort of campaign issue, partly because it’s so obviously true and partly because it’s so perfectly safe. Who, after all, is pro litter? 

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, as it were, the city through acts of both omission and commission is too often among the main sponsors of general shabbiness. Some of that stuff piled at the recycling center undoubtedly left the scene of the crime and ended up in somebody’s yard, plastered against a fence or flapping in a tree along Broadway, waving “Welcome to Galveston, the home of free-range plastic bags.” 

And then there are all the times the city fails to cut high weeds in its own rights of way and all the times the city fails to ensure owners keep their private property up to reasonable standards of cleanliness. And that point is not about issuing a ticket every time a paper cup shows up in somebody’s yard. It’s about policing the known owners of major tracts that become major eyesores. 

For example, the lots north of Broadway in front of the County Justice Center that can go for weeks looking as if a festival had just packed up and moved out of there.

And perhaps the most perfect example in this context is the fact that old campaign signs are allowed to loiter along Harborside Drive for months after the candidate’s political ambitions have been trucked off to a landfill.

It’s pretty safe to say that litter control and code enforcement have been among the top five talking points of every candidate in every municipal election in Galveston since at least the late 1990s. Little has improved, however.

The council that will be sworn in after May 12 could begin writing a happy ending for this story if it would just keep the same focus on this problem that the individual candidates now have.

The second story is this: The city is grossly underestimating and failing to respond effectively to the demand among residents for recycling services. People here pretty clearly intend to recycle. Like people everywhere, they do that chore when they have time, which often is on weekends and holidays.    

Granted, this photograph was taken on the second day of a long weekend, but the after-hours boxes don’t look much better on a typical weekend. And that’s the point. The city’s efforts to accommodate the demand for recycling services is inadequate and out of sync with demand.       

It’s time city staff and the council got that picture. 

 

(3) comments

seamus
Jim Casey

I pick up trash in my yard every day—beer and liquor bottles, soda cans, dirty baby diapers, and fast-food packaging. This kind of thing has been going on as long as I can remember, which is 50-some years.

The police are just a little too busy with drunk drivers and dope dealers to bother with people who litter, even it they happen to observe the offense.

The Daily News, as a long-standing matter of editorial policy, wants the city to cut expenses—especially for public employees.

So who is supposed to pick up this trash or staff the recycling center seven days a week? Elves? The dwarfs from Snow White?

- Jim

Mary Branum

A good way to start is with the residents picking up their own trash!

Yes, the City must need by example. Not only is the fire station a terrible sight, but the city property on Market, where service vehicles are kept, could use a mowing. They should also use Round-up 365 to get the grass and weeds off the curbs and street.
Seems like most City workers wear blinders when they drive the streets. Can't take more than 30 seconds to post a notice over code violations.
Love my house, tired of living in the midst of a dump!!!

Michael Culpepper

One great example of the city failing to lead by example is the state of disrepair and dangerous condition the City has let the historic fire station building at 2828 Marke fall into.

. Not only is this City owned landmarked structure violating many building codes, it is also a dangerous building and has been for years.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.