(7) comments Back to story

Miceal O'Laochdha

Another red-letter day for me, when I find myself in full agreement (and even appreciation) of our Editor.

As to the last paragraph about it being idiotic to trust the City with money, well I guess we have to trust them with some amount money but, to believe any story they come up with in order to get more, is indeed idiotic. And that hardly stops at out own City.

realistically, we are all blessed if we are able to trust our own family and small circle of friends with money...

Ellen Morrison

At the Candidate Forum at the Grand, Elizabeth Beeton said she's in favor of returning this money to the taxpayers - and her history on council indicates she would.

That same night, Jim Yarbrough said he'd have to "look at it" first, and then said it should probably be an incremental rollback if it would happen at all. His history indicates that no such rollback would occur. The County tax rate increased while he was Commissioner, the public debt increased _by 1000%_, and then there was the Justice Center overrun....

I don't want him handling my tax dollars, thank you!

Steve Fouga

"But the argument at this point really isn’t about numbers. It’s about trust."

This is the only part of Heber's editorial I disagree with. For me it's about numbers. I wouldn't trust Galveston city government as far as I could throw 'em.

By the way, I could throw Elizabeth Beeton a heckuva lot further than Jim Yarbrough.

Raif Smith

Our streets and infrastructure are in bad shape. Years of bad management and lack of money. People complain about the condition of the city one day and want a tax cut the next. Is $5 dollars a month per thousand such a real burden for the average taxpayer

We have jobs in Galveston. Just look at ,the causeway inbound traffic on a week day morning. Our population will remain static or decline as long as our town looks crappy.

But then there is the trust issue

Raif Smith

My math was off. $60 per 100,000 is $5 per month pert 1000,000

Steve Fouga

raifm, I agree with you about preferring a nice-looking city to having the money. But since not much is being done to improve the city anyway, I'd just as soon have the money.

Miceal O'Laochdha

Wise choice Jake. There is no direct correlation between giving the City money and any actual improvements to the City. When City employees want more money (probably to donate to Mayor and Council Candidates most likely to benefit them) they just quadruple your monthly water bill and hope you won't notice when you check your back account balance. If you do notice, they tell you there is little they can do but, maybe will send someone to actually read the meter in a week or two.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.