TEXAS CITY — The city, county, school district and College of the Mainland will have to repay Valero about $4.8 million after a Galveston County jury agreed with the oil company’s argument that its Texas City refinery was overvalued on the tax rolls.

In 2011, the Galveston Central Appraisal District assessed three of Valero’s properties, which include the refinery, to have a taxable value of $526.8 million. Valero argued that appraisers did not fairly compare the refinery with other industrial properties in the city and that the value of the facility was actually $333.4 million.

Refunds possible

Late Thursday, a jury in Judge Lonnie Cox’s 56th District Court ruled in Valero’s favor and lowered the company’s assessed value by $189.4 million for the 2011 tax year.

Because Valero already had paid its property taxes, the Texas City school district, the city, college and county might have to refund the difference. The taxing districts had just finished paying off an agreed settlement with Valero over values on the same properties for the 2006 through 2009 tax years.

The appraisal district is considering appealing the decision, Chief Appraiser Ken Wright said.

Because of the possible appeal, Valero spokesman Bill Day was limited in his response to the jury’s decision.

“Valero is pleased with the jury’s decision,” Day said. “We feel that it affirms Valero’s method for equalizing value.”

Texas City’s big bill

If the ruling holds up, Texas City school district will have the biggest check to write Valero, $2.45 million.

District spokeswoman Melissa Tortorici said the payback wouldn’t have a significant affect on the district’s budget.

“We have been able to put a plan in place that would allow us to not become dependent on the value that was in question,” Tortorici said. “Our business and finance department has been anticipating this lawsuit, so we have been planning our budgets based on a 95 percent tax collection rate. Any money that we have collected over that 95 percent has been put in reserves to be used in case the ruling went in favor of (Valero).”

‘The citizens don’t deserve this’

Texas City schools paid Valero $2.38 million as part of the 2009 settlement.

Texas City Mayor Matt Doyle said the $804,000 the city might have to pay back won’t cause much belt tightening either, but he doesn’t appreciate having to write a check.

“Any kind of impact would be on our reserves,” Doyle said. “The citizens of Texas City don’t deserve this. They are good citizens who support industry. We are as friendly to industry as we can be.

“We provide them with a good working environment with skilled labor, and (Valero) shouldn’t go about it this way.”

Doyle, who is pushing for an appeal, said that based on a pattern of filing lawsuits over its appraised property values, the company was not acting “as a good corporate citizen.”

“This is about good business for the city,” Doyle said. “You’ve got to keep your gloves up with these guys.”

Still a good neighbor

Noting Valero’s contributions to charities and its safety awards, Day insisted the company is a good corporate neighbor.

“Valero used the proper methods provided under the law to accurately dispute its assessment,” Day said. “While (the mayor) wants to make sure all the citizens pay their fair share of taxes, I’m confident he would not want any of his citizens to have to unfairly overpay — in this case, by a very large amount — on their taxes.”

Wright said given the 2009 lawsuit, the recent decision and the fact that Valero has already filed a lawsuit over its 2012 taxes based on the same argument, it might be time to re-evaluate how industrial properties are assessed.

“I’m not satisfied,” Wright said. “I’d only be satisfied if we had won. It is easy to point the finger at one person (for the defeat). I think it would behoove my board of directors if we put together a document showing what happened ... and then I would expect a plan to address our deficiencies.”

What the taxing bodies owe Valero

Texas City ISD: $2,453,057.24

Galveston County: $1,160,803.80

City of Texas City: $804,870.94

College of the Mainland: $439,402.72

By the numbers

Original Assessed Value: $526,796,990

Jury ordered value: $337,415,593

Difference: $189,381,397

Editor’s note: Based on 2011 tax rates. Taxes are paid based at rate per $100 of assessed property value.

SOURCE: Galveston Central Appraisal District

Contact Mainland Editor T.J. Aulds at 409-683-5334 or tjaulds@galvnews.com.


(3) comments

George Croix

I guess Mayor Doyle would, himself, be happy to get ripped off on his tax payments, and would never demand a refund when overcharged unfairly?
TC has milked enough out of the industry cash cows to turn a cow flop covered coastal prairie into a reasonably decent small town in way less time than it would have taken with just the tax revenues from a small population.
Give the Valero people their money back, and 'moo-ve' on.

Gary Miller

Valero isn't a taxpayer. They collect taxes from customers.
Valero's only sourse of money for taxes is customers.
G CAD overcharged Valero's customers.
Higher taxes must be paid by higher prices.
G CAD made the mistake, why aren't they repaying any of the overcarge?
Mistakes are a deliberate, budget growth, policy of G CAD. The more mistakes they make the more employees they need to settle disputes. Mistakes not challenged bring in extra money.
Look at the amounts of the refunds.
If Valero hadn't chalenged G CAD numbers their customers would have had to keep paying for the overchgarges. TC, TCISD, COM, GC would have kept spending money illegally added to Valero's prices.

Gary Miller

G-CAD illegaly over charged Valero's customers. Their customers are Valero's only sorce of money to pay taxes including illegaly excessive taxes.
Attacking Valero insted of G-CAD is political corruption.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.