• Welcome!
    Logout|My Dashboard

‘Justice has to be served’ - The Galveston County Daily News: Local News

October 28, 2016

‘Justice has to be served’

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.


    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • terrymoore posted at 10:10 am on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    terrymoore Posts: 131

    This is so heartbreaking...I hope they find the person or persons. To brutally kill two young women shows how heartless and evil they are.

  • sverige1 posted at 12:10 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    sverige1 Posts: 4054

    It's very likely that if (and hopefully when) the suspects are caught, that they'll be tried for a "hate" crime.

  • kevjlang posted at 12:56 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    kevjlang Posts: 4036

    And, more than likely, there will be some that object to the "Hate Crime" designation under the premise that if the victims were a couple of white college beer buddies that the accused couldn't also be subject to the death penalty.

    I wonder which side QX will be on if it turns out that the perpetrator is an angry young homophobic black man.

  • sverige1 posted at 1:48 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    sverige1 Posts: 4054

    Response to kevjlang posted at 12:56 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014:

    It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the perpetrator(s) was/were angry, homophobic individuals. A likely scenario would be that the perpetrators propositioned the young women (or questioned them and their sexuality). The homophobes didn't like what they heard, and the two young women told them to jump in a lake, so to speak. The perpetrators probably got angry, then sought revenge in the form of deadly assault.

    The likes of Quannel X will have to come to terms that violence has no racial "rhyme or reason" (this evidently is "black on black"), and I would imagine that Quannel has to revisit his faith stance/belief in regard to homosexuality. I believe his faith mindset still believes that homosexuality is "an abomination".

  • carlosrponce posted at 1:54 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    carlosrponce Posts: 6350

    Texas has a "Hate Crimes" Law called "The Texas James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act enacted into law in 2001 to classify crimes motivated by the victim’s race, religion, color, sex, disability, sexual preference, age or national origin." I agreed with Governor George W. Bush who argued that such a law was not necessary. In fact it DELAYS justice. The prosecution has to PROVE intent with respect to hate under one of the conditions given. Without the law, if found guilty the perp may be executed by lethal injection. With the law the perp may still be executed by lethal injection but at a much later date. It's a defense attorney's dream come true. Some would argue why worry about the delay if the outcome is the same? Tell that to the victims' families who face a prolonged trial.

  • sverige1 posted at 2:55 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    sverige1 Posts: 4054

    Well, carlosrponce:
    Let's look at it by this angle -
    If I had to be a surviving relative of an individual who had been murdered, I would very likely want each and every "tried" charge to be visited, reviewed, and administered in honor of the legacy of my loved one.

    The "hate" crime measure is, for many, a socially conscious effort to transform our society (hopefully) into one that one day will not suffer from hate due to race/sex orientation, et cetera. I would think that MLK would be a proponent of "hate" crime measures. It's all about justice, in the theoretical sense.

  • kevjlang posted at 3:54 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    kevjlang Posts: 4036

    Hate Crime laws were developed because perpetrators were able to convince juries that the black kid, gay person, disabled person, or whatever "deserved" to die because of their "deficiency". If a person kills someone at random, but winds up getting convicted under a hate crime, I'm not too sure how sympathetic I should be. After all, the person still CHOSE to kill another human being for no good reason. If they happen to be stuck waiting for an appointment with an executioner or waiting for their maker to come and take them back, they still made their own bed. If a guy kills someone because he poured/spilled a drink on his ostrich boots, or because he made a pass at him, or because she rejected his come-on, he's still a malicious individual that has demonstrated an ill-suiting to living in a civilized society.

    If the state goes for Hate Crime, and the jury doesn't buy it, the jury can just convict on what is proven.

  • kevjlang posted at 3:59 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    kevjlang Posts: 4036

    Of course, this is all presupposing what the perpetrator(s) will be charged with if/when he/she/they is/are caught. However, based on what seems evident so far, Hate Crime may not even be needed to make this a capital crime. After all, there was the theft of an automobile involved, and multiple means of killing used. So, it doesn't seem like these would be "heat of passion" or purely random "accidents".

  • carlosrponce posted at 4:17 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    carlosrponce Posts: 6350

    Name me a "crime" that didn't result from "hate" of one form or another. Employers hate my (fill in the blank) so I rob so I can live. People hate me or I hate my life so I take drugs. Why punish me just because you hate drugs? Society hates drug takers. The government hates my lifestyle of not paying taxes or bills so they put me in prison. I struck that person because he hated my (fill in the blank). Why should society hate me just because I want to love children physically? Rape is a hate crime, theft is a hate crime, pedophilia is a hate crime, murder is a hate crime, drug use is a hate crime, every crime is a "hate crime". Delayed justice just gives perps more than their 15 minutes of fame.

  • sverige1 posted at 5:31 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    sverige1 Posts: 4054

    Response to carlosrponce posted at 4:17 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014:

    Sure, every crime has elements of "hate" contained in the act. However, in decades past, a preponderance of assaults, lynchings, deaths, etc were committed soley because of "hate" that even transcended the desire to kill for money, passion, settling bets. A "hate" crime (and perhaps we should review the legal term) is a crime committed simply because the perpetrator has a psychological disdain for the other person. The crime committed through "hate" would be inexplicable otherwise.

    Most "hate" crimes (defined as such these days) are not because of crime of passion, settling scores, nor the desire to rob. "Hate" crimes go deeper.

  • kevjlang posted at 8:34 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    kevjlang Posts: 4036

    Under normal conditions, capital murder has to show that there was something in the distinct relationship between the accused and the victim. The fact that one person is dead is not enough to justify capital murder. The state has to show that I had a specific set of reasons why I killed you. I was robbing a bank and I killed you so I could get the money or escape. I wanted your car, but I didn't want you in it, and I didn't want you as a witness to what I look like or where I headed. You went out with the girl I had a crush on, and I needed to eliminate the competition and win her love.

    For a Hate Crime, the sole reason reason I'm killing you has nothing to do with anything between us, nor me being in the act of commiting a felony. I hate your type of people. I need to cleanse the world of your type. Never saw you before in my life, but you represent that which I hate.

    Now, I could argue that no one sane would harbor that belief. It's a completely irrational train of thought. I must be insane. I'll spend some time in mental health care, and perhaps be cured, and be let back into society, where I'd be free to conjure up some other obsene prejudice and kill again. I could also argue that a sane person isn't going to come to a premeditated decision to kill someone. However, if we follow those lines of reason, that all captital murder convictions should, instead, be insanity convictions, and therefore not punishable by the death penalty. There are definitely quite a few liberals that would buy into that line of reasoning. However, is that the way you want to see it?

    The killers of James Byrd, Jr. attacked merely because James Byrd, Jr. was there and he was black. They had plenty of opportunity to avoid killing him, but their hatred of blacks made it convenient to maim him and kill him. They had no specific reason to hate Byrd. It was purely to have one less black man in the world. Without it being called a hate crime, I can certainly see these guys finding clever legal arguments that they were just loons that deserved care and feeding in a country club mental institution for the rest of their natural lives, courtesy of you and me.

    No, I have no problem with animals like those guys sitting on death row because they choose to adopt an irrational hatred for a class of people and decide to single out one perceived member of that class as an example to the rest.

    Having an irrational hatred for a class of people should not be a line of defense. I have no problem with it being a line of prosecution. I'm not going to say that it should be illegal for John King to be prejudiced toward blacks, nor that he he should be punished merely because he hates them. However, if he goes around killing people merely because he chooses to not control his prejudice and hatred, then I have no problem with him being convicted of capital murder because of it. There are plenty of people on death row due to their inability to control emotions much more instantaneous than that.

  • carlosrponce posted at 9:11 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    carlosrponce Posts: 6350

    Those who killed James Byrd Jr.:
    Lawrence Russell Brewer was executed in the Huntsville Unit on September 21, 2011.
    John William King as found guilty and sentenced to death for his role in Byrd's kidnapping and murder
    Shawn Allen Berry The driver of the truck, Berry was the most difficult to convict of the three defendants because there was a lack of evidence to suggest that he was a racist. Berry claimed that Brewer and King were entirely responsible for the crime. Berry was spared the death penalty and was sentenced to life in prison.
    All three were convicted prior to the passage of the James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act. Would a "Hate Crimes Act" have made a difference in the outcome? Probably delayed the execution of Brewer but no real difference.

  • carlosrponce posted at 9:17 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    carlosrponce Posts: 6350

    So, you would set set a scale for hate crimes. "On a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 is mild hate and 10 is extreme hate, how would you juror's rate this man's hate?" Sorry but Hate is Hate. You cannot look into a man's soul, you can only be fooled by lawyers.

  • sverige1 posted at 9:33 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    sverige1 Posts: 4054

    Well, carlosrponce -
    Jurors all the time have to weigh the percentage of "fault", even on both sides, when considering certain cases such as car crashes that result in death, damage, and/or injury. You have to realize that the 1-10 scale is one of many methods used by the jury foreman/foreperson to guide the other jurors into making good decisions.

    As kevin mentioned in his 8:34 post, the bottom line issue with "hate" crime is that the perpetrator(s) did it because they hated the victim. In this case, if the prosecutors can prove it was a "hate" crime, then that is where it will go. You and I can't change this relatively new law.

    In reality, I think the prosecution will have no problem in entertaining the "hate crime" element. These 2 young women were hurting no one. There's no proof that $ was stolen from them. The perpetrators did not know them and they were lesbian individuals. Points to "hate crime".

  • carlosrponce posted at 10:28 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    carlosrponce Posts: 6350

    Add to that the fact that he dumped the bodies on Bolivar then fled the scene in a stolen vehicle. It looks pretty damning. I hope they catch him. The drawing looks pretty good. Wonder if they have any leads. But don't worry, his attorney will put some spin on it.

  • rah posted at 11:35 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    rah Posts: 212

    I hope the law finds the guilty party and the dreebs pay for their crime.

    Now, has Quanell X forgotten where he lives or is he looking for a new place to call home? I think he is more welcome in Houston,

  • kevjlang posted at 11:57 pm on Wed, Mar 12, 2014.

    kevjlang Posts: 4036

    I think I misinterpreted the following statement:

    "State law enforcement officials, along with Jasper's District Attorney, determined that since Brewer and King were well-known white supremacists, the murder was a hate crime."

    Further research finds that Texas didn't pass a Hate Crime law until 2001. Their crime, while termed a hate crime, wasn't prosecuted as such. Fortunately, the jury saw through it as a heinous crime that deserved maximum punishment.

    In any event, if someone is so blinded by prejudice against certain classes of human beings that he goes out and wantonly tries to rid humanity of people of that class, then I have no sympathy if their crime gets further enhanced because of that. A person's prejudice is not a license to open hunting season on whatever group of humans you're prejudiced against.