GALVESTON — Last week, a lawsuit that sought to block construction of two mixed-income housing developments in Galveston came to conclusion, of sorts.

On Aug. 14, U.S. District Court Judge Gregg Costa officially dismissed three complaints made against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the city of Galveston and the Galveston Housing Authority on claims of civil rights and fair housing violations.

Those claims, brought by the island-based Galveston Open Government Project and a group of plaintiffs, were dismissed with prejudice. The Open Government Project has said it intends to appeal the ruling to the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans

In the meantime, local agencies are assessing how much the lswsuit cost, both in legal fees and in other costs related to the developments.

Local agency costs

The housing authority’s defense against the lawsuit, filed Dec. 3, 2013, was led by its contracted lawyer, Carla Cotropia.

Cotropia said the housing authority was charged $103,976.32 for legal fees and expenses related to the lawsuit during the nine months it was in court.

Irwin R. “Buddy” Herz, chairman of the housing authority’s board of commissioners, said the costs could have been much higher had the lawsuit required more detailed work, such as depositions or discovery.

“Although this sounds high to many people, when it comes to a major lawsuit, I’ve seen millions of dollars spent on legal fees, on both sides,” Herz said. “I wish the housing authority had not had to spend this amount, in a lawsuit that had no solid base and was more political than it was based on any great legal analogy.”

Herz said the housing authority’s legal fees were paid for with insurance funds that are tied to the construction of the developments.

Unlike the housing authority, the city of Galveston employs its own staff attorney, who defends against the lawsuit.

City spokeswoman Elizabeth Rogers said that the city’s costs were limited to filing fees. The city attorneys do not specifically track the hours they worked on city litigation, Rogers said.

Costa dismissed the case without ordering the Open Government Project to reimburse the housing authority or the city for legal costs.


It’s unclear how much the Open Government Project spent so far on the lawsuit.

The group’s attorney, Shari Goldsberry, said in an email that she received no payment from the Open Government Project for her services.

“GOGP has paid staff expenses and case expenses (filing fees, service fees, etc.) but there have been no fees paid for my time or the time of my co-counsel Lori Laird,” Goldsberry wrote. “In terms of hours of my time, I quite frankly stopped looking at it after awhile because it was so much.”

Goldsberry said that during three and a half years, she had spent more than 1,000 hours on work related to housing issues in Galveston.

That time would likely increase if the Open Government Project appeals.

Plea for funding

David Stanowski, president of the Open Government Project, could not be reached for comment regarding his group’s intent to appeal, however, a statement on the organization’s website asked supporters to donate money for that purpose.

“As the case dragged on and on, we were forced to do most of the research and preparation that will be necessary for the appeal, just to finish the case,” the statement said. “This means that the good news is that we need far less money for the appeal than we first thought, because much of the work has already been paid for.

“The bad news is that the government’s tactics were successful in wasting a lot of our money, so we still need some more, at this time. This money will pay our lawyers to take our research and preparation and draft the briefs for the appeal.”

It’s unclear how much the Open Government Project has spent on its advocacy against public housing.

The Open Government Project is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and is required to file publicly accessible tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service. Generally, the tax returns outline a group’s charitable spending, as well as its expenses for administration. However, groups that receive less than $50,000 a year are only required to submit a less-detailed returns, called Form 990-N, that gives only the most basic information about the organization.

The Open Government Project has submitted the less detailed forms to the IRS every year since 2010.

The Open Government Project asked the district court to order defendants to reimburse the organization for expenses because it had been forced to abandon its role as a government watchdog and divert its resources into fighting the housing developments, although it never cited an exact number in court filings.

Construction costs

The lawsuit had effects other than legal costs on the price of the mixed-income housing projects, according to officials. The halt in construction caused by the lawsuit increased the cost of one of the housing developments.

Before the lawsuit was filed, the housing authority received cost estimates from its chosen contractor, Sullivan Brothers Builders, for the developments at sites of the former Cedar Terrace apartment complex.

The company originally estimated $19.3 million for constructing Cedar Terrace, said Deyna Sims-Hobdy, the attorney hired by the housing authority to help it negotiate the construction contracts.

The lawsuit prevented the authority and McCormack Baron Salazar, the private developer that it is partnering with to construct the developments, from closing the deal that would guarantee that price, however.

Because of the lawsuit, the state attorney general’s office would not approve tax-exempt bonds meant to finance the construction. Without the financing, an agreement could not be reached with the construction company.

The housing authority ultimately reached an agreement with the Texas General Land Office to use uncommitted disaster recovery funds instead of bonds to finance the project, but during the time it took to reach that agreement, the contractors were left in a state of limbo.

In February, Sullivan told the housing authority that it could no longer guarantee its original estimate, and submitted a new one for $20 million.

Sims-Hobdy said there was never a signed agreement for the original price of Cedar Terrace.

“It is important to understand that construction costs are greatly impacted by events in the economy, and timing is everything in bidding and prices,” Sims-Hobdy said. “The construction environment had been heating up during the months when they were attempting to hold on to the original bid.”

The development on the Magnolia Homes site, which was long scheduled to begin later than Cedar Terrace site, did not receive an original estimate from Sullivan Brothers. The construction cost on that development will be $26.7 million.

Construction of the developments is expected to begin later this year.

Contact reporter John Wayne Ferguson at 409-683-5226 or Follow him on Twitter, @johhnwferguson.

(11) comments

Mike Leahy

Various elements of the City of Galveston officialdom continues to provide Ms. Cotropia with a golden trough...

Raymond Lewis

Correction, GOGP made it possible for Ms. Cotropia to feed at that (so called) 'golden trough'. As the drunken Panda said, "It's not that no one listened to the side of GOGP. The problem for them is that some one finally did."

Lisa Blair

It would be interesting to see an accounting of the GOGP's expenditures of donated funds, since their attorney's are working pro-bono.

Steve Fouga

It will be interesting to see the increase in the cost of policing, crime prevention, and prisoner detention that will follow the new sites.

Lisa Blair

Sure it would be, if it had actually happened. We'll have to wait and see, but the GOGP has already spent people's money, making it more interesting right now.

Bill Broussard

Lisa: I have no idea about what you are trying to say in this post. Might you try again?

George Croix

Guess the new tenants will have to draw for short straw to see who gets stuck with a 175,000 dollar unit versus the regular 275 grand ones so the bill gets paid...[whistling]

Bill Broussard

Herz said. “I wish the housing authority had not had to spend this amount, in a lawsuit that had no solid base and was more political than it was based on any great legal analogy.”

I'm sure Buddy knows what he's talking about. With him at the helm, Lyda Ann Thomas OKing the first rebuilding agreement after the storm and the Sullivan's benifitng to the tune of at least $20 MM and possibly $46 MM, and MBS being such a huge campaign supporter of our President, Buddy should be able to spot politics in a instant.

Mike Leahy

I do not feel any too "corrected" there TrebleClef...

GOGP did not tell the Housing Authority which lawyers to buy with the taxpayers money. But, our all of our city's quasi-officials always return the "The Usual Suspects".

What, The Park Board has nothing for her to do? Or are they also providing this lawyer billable hours?

Raymond Lewis

In fairness to your point m.o'laochdha, a few city entities do keep her busy.

Evelyn Clark

I wonder what the GOGP have to tell all the people (APARTMENTS Owners , EYC) where all the money went. When they agreed to keep the Low-Income Housing ) from being rebuilt.

Who bought this GOGP to Galveston to increase tensions among.the people The HP was there before the storm and quickly demolished with promise to rebuild.
This GOGP came along with the Blessing of certain people (SEND THEM TO MAINLAND) And . I am speaking of council Greenberg.

Every city in the USA has to have a LOW INCOME RENTAL BY LAW.

Now they have failed they want the city to pay . Where are the GOGP BOOKS.
justing asking. [sad ][sad]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.