• Welcome!
    Logout|My Dashboard

Charter school facing similar financial difficulties as LMISD - The Galveston County Daily News: Local News

September 29, 2016

Charter school facing similar financial difficulties as LMISD

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.


    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • IHOG posted at 3:26 pm on Mon, Jan 28, 2013.

    IHOG Posts: 2486

    ( Most of its funding is from the state? )
    Like all state charter schools they rely on state funding without local taxes.
    I wonder what other funding they get. Donations from business? Pleased and satisfied parents? People who care about quality education?
    The minimum standards for Charter schools is higher than the standards for union run schools who use both state funding AND local tax funding.
    Charter schools are better and cheaper because the charter law requires it.
    Higher quality education at bargan prices.

  • IHOG posted at 3:15 pm on Tue, Jan 29, 2013.

    IHOG Posts: 2486

    Loss of students is a bigger problem for State charter schools than for ISD schools.
    Their only guaranteed funding is state funding that is based on enrolement.
    ISD schools have state funding based on enrolement in addition to local tax funding.
    ISD schools cost more because their per student finding from the state is the same as per student funding for Charter schools. Then ISD schools have local tax funding over and above state funding. The more students attending charter schools the less local taxes are needed to educate our children.

  • Lyra Mitchell posted at 9:11 pm on Tue, Jan 29, 2013.

    Lyra Mitchell Posts: 52

    Aaaand there lies the crux of your true problem with the local schools. It's very clear you resent supporting your communities' young with any local funds. Why should we have any personal stake/responsibility in our school district when they can just be supported from the general fund by the state?

    To purport that charters are superior by their charter designation is silly. There are good ones and bad ones. Just like everything. Here are a few things that I'm aware of concerning charters.

    - The minimum requirement for a Texas charter school teacher is a high school diploma...UNBELIEVABLE! Even a substitute at public school has to have an Associate's degree.

    - 32% of charters were held using an alternate accounting system
    (a lesser standard)

    - A large portion of the schools that are struggling financially (required to come up with emergency plans for TEA) are charters. They have less oversight, so I'm reluctant to sign over any blank checks.

    Keep in mind, there is more school choice within the public school system than ever before. Schools that fail to meet federal AYP standards two years in a row are required to bus their students to a neighboring well-performing district. Many local districts have Magnet programs, Gifted and Talented programs, and open enrollment. These are good things for the community. There is room for charters in Texas, but to suggest they're superior to public school is an untrue generalization.

  • Margurite posted at 1:55 pm on Wed, Jan 30, 2013.

    Margurite Posts: 682

    We been tellin him that for a very long time. LOL He has TEA in his ears.....[beam]

  • MissionaryMan posted at 8:07 am on Thu, Jan 31, 2013.

    MissionaryMan Posts: 3296

    According to TEA's website:

    "Texas is the 15th weakest of the nations 42 charter laws.

    In 2011 there were 444 charters serving 149,348 students.

    As of December 2011, 52 charter schools were closed".

  • MissionaryMan posted at 8:09 am on Thu, Jan 31, 2013.

    MissionaryMan Posts: 3296

    Sorry, that wasn't listed on TEA's website, but rather on another site on the internet that I googled.

  • IHOG posted at 2:30 pm on Mon, Apr 1, 2013.

    IHOG Posts: 2486

    Fewer students equals less state funding.
    Chicago this weekend admitted the loss of students ( related to population decline )
    has forced them to close 105 public school facilities. 54 are public school campusses, 51 are administration buildings. Together employing over 9,000 teachers and support staff.
    Public employee unions are organizing street riots opposing the flood of pink slip notices needed to reduce staffing.
    They have too many buildings, too many classrooms and too many teachers for the remaining students. Just like LM ISD. The unions want no reductions of buildings, teachers, support staff or classrooms. Keep the tax money flowing.
    Public schools are not for educating children, they are for union paychecks.

  • Margurite posted at 2:51 pm on Mon, Apr 1, 2013.

    Margurite Posts: 682

    You have this issue with unions I have never quite understood. If you don't want to belong to one - then don't.

    Unions is what brought about the 40 hour work week, got children out of sweat shops and factories into schools to begin with and also brought many protective standards to the forefront in the mining, steel, and manufacturing industry. Don't tell me unions have no place.

    I have never belonged to a union in my life but I know they have value. Your rants against unions just to rant - tells me you know less about them than I do..... LOL

  • IHOG posted at 10:40 am on Tue, Apr 2, 2013.

    IHOG Posts: 2486

    It would be hard to know less about unions than you. If you would learn just a little you wouldn't like them either.
    I've belonged to three different unions over the years and was a founding member of one union. After learning how coprrupt they are I got out.
    The things you credit to unions were beginning to happen without unions.
    Some of what unions did was good before federal labor laws were passed. Since then most of what unions have done has been bad.

  • IHOG posted at 10:53 am on Tue, Apr 2, 2013.

    IHOG Posts: 2486


    I object to unions not for what they have done to/for members but what they are doing to the nation. You aplaud the good unions USED to do, The bad they do NOW is what i oppose.
    Nearly every industry that has left the U.S. did it to get rid of unions, American cities and states in financial trouble are the result of union political influence.
    I suspect you and I could compile a longer list of bad things unions do now than the short list of good they did then.

  • cougargator posted at 8:56 pm on Wed, Apr 3, 2013.

    cougargator Posts: 331

    IHOG - As a long-time educator here in Texas, we don't have the same unions for educators like we know from other states. The two "unions" as you would call them in Texas, aren't like those in places like New York or Illinois. Most pay dues to the organizations to have an attorney in case they get sued, and have liability insurance in case you get sued. You don't have to join these organizations in order to get hired.
    I know unions have done some very good things; however, many education unions have done something I wouldn't want my dues to pay for.