• Welcome!
    Logout|My Dashboard

Dike study gets OK - The Galveston County Daily News: Local News

December 8, 2016

Dike study gets OK

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.


    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • RonShelby posted at 8:34 am on Fri, May 9, 2014.

    RonShelby Posts: 1061

    Why did Beeton vote against? It wasn't in the story.

  • Michael posted at 3:06 pm on Fri, May 9, 2014.

    Michael Posts: 60

    Possibly she voted against it because there are other less expensive and better options. The Ike Dike, because it is pushed by TAMUG, seems to have developed a life of its own. Rice University studied the situation and suggested a more limited and less expensive alternative that does not destroy the beach from HIgh Island to Freeport. GCDN might have done a story on that study, but I don't remember seeing it. Living on Boliver or the West End would be much different if you were behind a wall with no beach and no view of the gulf. We need to study the OPTIONS, not the IKE DIKE.

  • isleshire posted at 4:08 pm on Fri, May 9, 2014.

    isleshire Posts: 636

    Well, she'd be wrong about that. The Cemetery Gates proposed by Rice will end up costing the same and saving no one. Texas City and the rest of Galveston County would be swamped. The height of the water at the north end of the bay would be 24' in the worst case scenario. The Ike Dike protects many more and does so with a much simpler project.
    You have to wonder about the kind of person who fails to educate her followers on what is necessary to live on the coast and instead follow the knee-jerk respondents into an ugly future.

  • Michael posted at 10:03 pm on Fri, May 9, 2014.

    Michael Posts: 60

    Didn't mean to insinuate that I support (or have even read) the entire Rice proposal. Just saying I think there's a much cheaper and better way to protect Galveston and we should look at all the possibilities. I certainly don't speak for Ms Beeton, but I think the ugly future would be the entire upper Texas coast without a beach, just one long seawall.

  • npappous posted at 10:36 pm on Fri, May 9, 2014.

    npappous Posts: 578

    Concern for this funding centered around the fact that the money may be wasted if CoE are not on board with how the study will be conducted. There was no request from CoE, TAMUG, or Rice. Is this money going to be counted as part of our $5 million match? No answer - so we may be needlessly spending this money twice...

    Had the CoE come and said this would count as part of our local match - the vote may have been 7-0.....