GALVESTON — As the cleanup operation for the Galveston Bay oil spill entered its 10th day Monday, officials began to talk about how they will begin to scale back the response that has now involved more than 2,200 people.

Officials said Monday they were beginning to develop standards on how clean is clean enough for crews to be able to stand down along the 100 or so miles of Texas shoreline that has been effected by the oil spill.

“The unified command works with the trustees for all the areas to develop a plan to give us an endpoint of what clean is for that area,” said U.S. Coast Guard Petty Officer Andy Kendrick, a spokesman for the Unified Command Center responding to the spill.

“Each area is going to be different,” Kendrick said. “They haven’t even come to a definition (of what’s clean) for all of the places.”

As an example, Kendrick said one point of consideration on what is clean would be whether an oily sheen was still present on the surface of the water. In other places, the number of tar balls being washed up may be considered in determining the area’s status.

No area had been officially defined as of Monday afternoon, Kendrick said. Such proclamations will likely come in stages, with areas that have received small amounts of oil cleared first and more heavily effected areas remaining on the active cleanup list.

Before being declared clean, teams of responders will enter a “monitor and maintain” mode, during which cleanup crews will pull back and observe areas for signs of new pollution.

“Each area is going to be kind of its own thing,” Kendrick said. “We’re not going to just do a whole bunch of them at once.”

Since the spill began March 22, the highest-level responders have been working alternating 12-hour shifts to organize response efforts. The clear weather this weekend allowed crews to make significant progress, Kendrick said — to the point that some of the command staff were allowed time off to rest.

Other resources are still being sent from Galveston to points south where crews are facing more complicated logistical challenges because of the remoteness of Matagorda Island and the continued movement of the oil still drifting in the Gulf of Mexico. On Monday, oil was reported on Mustang Island and North Padre Island, almost 200 miles from where the spill originated.

For the Galveston area response, however, two notable points of progress appear to be approaching.

Oiled birds being rehabilitated in Baytown could be released back into the wild soon, though no date has been determined.

Charlie Kelly, the city of Galveston’s emergency management coordinator, said he hoped Boddeker Road and Seawolf Park on Pelican Island would be reopened to traffic by the end of the week, but he was hesitant to guarantee that would happen. Those areas are two of the spots most heavily oiled by the spill and have many heavy work vehicles being used in the cleanup.

“Those are priorities right now, but there’s also priorities to make sure the beaches are clean,” Kelly said. “I wish I could give you a date, but I really can’t say that.”

Though the visible response may soon be completed, the Texas General Land Office will continue to have a response team staged in Galveston for the weeks and months to come, Kelly said. That team will respond to any reports of oil that occur during the summer, down to the smallest tar ball. Any samples collected will be tested to determine their origin.

“There’s going to be ongoing cleanup for several weeks,” Kelly said. “They don’t just go away.”

Contact reporter John Wayne Ferguson at 409-683-5226 or john.ferguson@galvnews.com.

Locations

(6) comments

Mike Leahy

Is oil "hanging out under the piers" at the Port of Galveston, as I have heard from scuttlebutt?

I have seen that before, in other large spills in other ports, and the effect on final clean-up efforts is very challenging. The areas below the pier overhangs can trap a lot of oil on multiplied surface areas, which is very difficult to reach and remove. With each outgoing flow of tide, it tends to pollute the harbor and vessels over and over again.

Hope this is not the case in at the Galveston Wharves...

George Croix

One would think that the spill response officials in charge would have by now begun to use micro-bio on residual smaller and/or difficult to reach areas.
I do not know if doing so would require some special permit or 'environmental study', but it wouldn't surprise me for that to be the case.
Just to help them get started, if so, here's a clue: There is ALREADY an environmental impact. Pick the lessser of the two evils...
Costly, but likely cheaper than the manual process in these areas...

Steve Fouga

"One would think that the spill response officials in charge would have by now begun to use micro-bio on residual smaller and/or difficult to reach areas."

Wise words...

Steve Fouga

"That team will respond to any reports of oil that occur during the summer, down to the smallest tar ball."

This cracked me up big time! A prime opportunity for middle-school pranksters.

"Smallest tar ball" my @ss... Get the oil off the rock groins and jetties. Then you'll have my kudos.

George Croix

Uh, gee, Mr. Kelly, cleanup of small tar balls along Galveston beaches, and every other Gulf beach, has been going on for all of my 63 years, and unless Ma Nature just started natural seeps in 1951, long before that. And they will continue long after I'm gone. And you.
Might want to re-think the time line that separates an honest and thorough response from one that shows that the folks in charge have something approaching a lack of a lick of sense...

Centerpointe Moderator

Most of that historical contamination wasn't from seeps - it was from spills (large numbers of non-newsworthy small events plus some doozies such as Ixtoc).

Twenty five or thirty years ago, nobody went to the beach without a bottle of baby oil in their bag for removing the worst of the oil from their feet when they were done strolling along the water's edge. Children from that era remember their parents yelling at them to not get tar all over their car's upholstery. My husband tells me that rental beach houses in Galveston often had cleaning stations underneath them for the convenience of guests who needed to remove oil from their cars before returning to their regularly-scheduled lives.

Industrial hygiene improved dramatically starting around 1990 after the adoption of the state and federal regulatory frameworks under OPA and TOSPRA, and we haven't had to deal with that kind of constant black annoyance for many years now. Yes, you will still find the occasional tar ball along the beach at Galveston and yes, some of them are from seeps. But the vast majority of the stuff - the anthropogenic component - is long gone. Or it had been, until now.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.