The Board of Pilot Commissioners on Friday took no action on a possible joint meeting with the Galveston Wharves Board after commissioners took issue with recent actions and comments regarding the cruise industry.

“I live in Galveston and all the time I’m in Kroger and someone comes up to me and asks why we are trying to get rid of Carnival and Royal Caribbean,” pilot board Secretary Brad Boney said. “I don’t know what can be done with a joint meeting, but I’m frustrated by the constant repeating arguments about this issue.”

Friday’s decision comes after months of talk about cruise line insiders being concerned about pilots using fog delays to retaliate against ship operators who complain about rates.

Wharves board Chairman Ted O’Rourke gave pilot commissioners a letter on port letterhead in October 2017 asking for a meeting between the two groups and proposed several ways to resolve the dispute. Wharves trustees later chastised their chairman for sending the letter without board approval, but acknowledged the issues needed to be addressed.

Pilot commissioners Friday rejected much of the recent conversation as hearsay and said they wouldn’t hold a joint meeting with the wharves board unless they took action as a group.

“I don’t think that board is on the same page,” Commissioner Henry Porretto said. “They can come back to us when they are together.”

Pilot board Chairman Kenny Koncaba agreed and called much of the public conversation leading up to Friday’s meeting erroneous.

The Board of Pilot Commissioners oversees the 16-member pilots association that charges tariffs on foreign-flagged oil tankers, cruise ships or other vessels piloted into or out of Galveston County ports.

The association, which is overseen by the Board of Pilot Commissioners, a five-member panel appointed by the governor, does not face competition and has the authority to decide when it is safe to guide ships in and out of ports.

The monopoly is allowed because pilots vying for business might otherwise take unnecessary risks and cause unsafe waterways.

Commissioners Friday said they didn’t think O’Rourke’s overtures were in good faith and weren’t sure what positive effects a meeting would have.

“Our charge is all vessels trafficking in our waters,” Commissioner Trey Hill said. “I can’t say talking is a bad idea. It’s sad our boards are not working together better. But if the objective is just to knock out all the tariffs for the cruise industry, that’s not going to fly.”

Galveston Mayor and wharves board Trustee Jim Yarbrough spoke during the public comment section of Friday’s meeting. He suggested that rather than a joint meeting perhaps representatives from each board could meet to discuss a range of issues.

“We want to build a better relationship,” Yarbrough said. “We have nothing against the pilot commissioners. We just want to narrow down the issues and understand their perspective. I don’t think that gets done in a big, public board meeting. If the two boards meet, everyone runs to their side on the issue and nothing gets done.”

Koncaba was uncomfortable designating someone to meet with the wharves board in what he called a “backroom meeting.”

“We’re going to wait for some other type of communication from the port,” Koncaba said.

Matt deGrood: 409-683-5230;


(5) comments

Charlotte O'rourke


Other Texas ports would NOT have this problem because the port trustees have control of pilot rates and rules.

The port trustee is also the pilot commissioner in ports like Houston.

In Galveston, the port can’t even get a meeting to discuss issues with the pilot commission.

I hope more people follow Commissioner Boney around Kroger and ask .... what the heck, can’t you even listen and discuss the issues and concerns of the port’s two largest customers?

David Quintanilla

Testing to see if this is anonymous before I post

Bill Cochrane

Question. If safety, fog, and all the other reasons to even have Pilots are correct, then why are ONLY foreign registered ships required to have a pilot aboard? A ship with a US Coast Guard licensed captain driving must have a pilot aboard if the ship is registered in another company. But a ship that has a foreign captain, and registered in the United States does not have to have a Pilot aboard. Why?

Bill Cochrane

CORRECTION: "A ship with a US Coast Guard licensed captain driving must have a pilot aboard if the ship is registered in another company."
Should have said - "A ship with a US Coast Guard licensed captain driving must have a pilot aboard if the ship is registered in another COUNTRY".

Charlotte O'rourke

Interesting question that unfortunately doesn’t have logical answers.

My question - why do other Texas PORTS get to CONTROL the pilot monopoly through rates and rules and our port has NO control or input of the monopoly and can’t even schedule a meeting with the Pilot Commissioners who do have control?

It is my belief that the governed need to demand fairness from its government.

The pilot commissioners bemoan the lack of a good working relationship with the port but refuse to establish the dialogue and meetings necessary to improve those important working relationships!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for Reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.