GALVESTON — A federal judge has dismissed all but one of the plaintiffs involved in a lawsuit that attempts to stop the construction of public housing in Galveston.

In a 36-page memorandum released Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Gregg Costa dismissed five plaintiffs from the lawsuit — four individuals and the Galveston Open Government Project, the organization behind the lawsuit. 

In doing so, Costa dismissed arguments that individuals who might potentially live in two planned mixed-income developments had standing to sue because of their fears that housing could cause unlawful segregation.

“Unless or until someone who is going to be directly affected by the rebuilt public housing believes they are suffering an injury attributable to unlawful conduct, there is no ‘case’ or ‘controversy’ to resolve,” Costa wrote of the complaints made by Texas City residents Sandy Taylor, Daniel Jerome Arvie, Terrie Lynn Griffin and Galveston resident Janet Lynn. 

In the lawsuit, all four claim that the locations chosen for two mixed-income housing developments would cause harm to them. All four of the plaintiffs currently receive housing assistance through voucher programs, though only one, Lynn, currently lives in Galveston. 

The Galveston Housing Authority plans to construct two mixed-income housing developments to replace, in part, public housing that was torn down after Hurricane Ike in 2008. The developments would contain about 140 subsidized housing units built alongside an equal number of market-rate housing units. The developments would be built on the same sites as the former Cedar Terrace and Magnolia Homes developments at 2914 Ball St. and 1601 Strand St., respectively.

The judge ruled that none of the four could show they had been actually injured by the choice of location for the developments or that any harm was “certainly impending.”

Costa also ruled the Galveston Open Government Project, as an organization, did not have the standing to sue over the housing developments. The group had argued that it had suffered damages because it had spent money in an attempt to educate and advocate against the housing developments.

Costa dismissed that claim.

“A group like GOGP that serves as a watchdog over local public officials strengthens our system of self-government,” Costa wrote. “But that system of self-government would suffer if anyone had standing to file a lawsuit challenging a policy merely on the basis that they disagreed with the policy choices enacted after vigorous public debate.”

The lone remaining plaintiff is now Trysha McCardell, a Galveston resident who lives about 10 blocks from the site of the proposed Cedar Terrace development. 

In his memorandum, Costa wrote that because the neighborhood that McCardell lives in could be harmed by a possible “segregative effect” caused by the housing developments, her claim could move forward. However, Costa’s ruling said that whether McCardell will suffer a “concrete injury” as a result of the construction of public housing remains pending.

A fifth individual plaintiff, Bruce Munden, removed himself from the lawsuit voluntarily on April 25, according to court records.

In a statement sent to The Daily News, the Open Government Project vowed to continue supporting what remained of the lawsuit.

“The judge made no ruling on the merits of our case, he simply couldn’t directly connect these individual plaintiffs to the fair housing violations that we outlined,” read the statement. “We are disappointed to lose plaintiffs, but happy that the case is still moving forward, and we remain optimistic on an outcome that is decided on the merits.”

A hearing on the lawsuit is scheduled for Tuesday, during which the sides will discuss both Wednesday’s ruling and the Galveston Open Government Project’s request for an injunction to stop the construction of the developments as the lawsuit progresses.

Contact reporter John Wayne Ferguson at 609-683-5226 or john.ferguson@galvnews.com.

Tags

(10) comments

Ron Shelby

Fair under the law saying those with standing are only those who directly result in damages related to the action. I haven't seen a lot of research, but conceptually believe that scattered is probably better than concentrated. But then you get to the issue of who wants scattered next door to them. A lot of tough societal issues.... Of course we could make the scattered be next to every place a take home care Galveston police officer lives?? [smile]

Matt Coulson

So because the judge upheld one claim does that still hold up the financing of the project?

Ron Shelby

Definitely can. But the plaintiff has to still prove the level of damage resulting from concentrated housing....probably against some benchmark, but I'm not a lawyer.

Evelyn Clark

I am thinking abou having someone file a law suit against the one person that

has a claim against PH. If they can file a claim againt the PH l. I will get

someone to file one against her/him. they never lived in PH ,and I lived in

PH and I am a good person.


[beam][beam][beam][cool][smile]

Raymond Lewis

Slice it how you might but the GOGP suit has been dealt a death blow.

Matt Coulson

It sounds like it, but what I'm trying to understand is that the financing was being held up by the pending legal questions. Since the judge allowed one persons claims to remain does that still hold up financing. Seems like a major omission in the story.

Jim Casey


Whoever is funding this ongoing nonsense must be gritting his teeth. I hope he has a good dentist.

- Jim

Gary Miller

Building these HUD slums anywhere on the Island will be harmful to all galveston taxpayers. HUD will pay to build the projects but local taxpayers will end up with the cost of maintainence, the loss of tax base and the cost of unfunded services for untaxed project residents.
The greatest harm wil not acrue to residents of the projects but instead to Island residents who DO NOT live in the projects.

Raymond Lewis

Sorry IHOG but it pleases me to say that your opinion (which you are entitled to) is based on nothing but ...your opinion. You, obviously know little about any of it, including who gets "stuck" with maintenance cost

Steve Fouga

Who does get stuck with the costs?

I'm a lot more concerned with the crime than the maintenance. Who gets stuck with that cost?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.