Film Review Jackie

Caspar Phillipson as John F. Kennedy, left, and Natalie Portman as Jackie Kennedy in “Jackie.”

William Gray/Fox Searchlight via AP

The South American perspective of Jackie Kennedy is apparently similar to a horror movie seen through the eyes of director Pablo Larraín.

In his first English-language film, the 40-year-old surprisingly molds “Jackie” in the same structure of fellow Chilean director Alejandro Amenábar’s “The Others” (2001). The vicious editing choices paired with the savage musical score, reinforce “Jackie” as this unusual artistic chiller.

Of course, everything revolves around Oscar winner Natalie Portman’s supernatural performance as iconic first lady. I didn’t think it was possible, but Portman tops her “Black Swan” (2010) achievement. “Jackie” is so much more than just a female performance vehicle, it unapologetically explores the off camera, behind-the-scenes perspective of Mrs. Kennedy, offering a vantage point unseen in cinema.

“A first lady must be ready to pack her suitcases. It’s inevitable,” Jackie says. When the president of the United States was shot and killed in Dallas, his wife lost more than a husband, she lost more than anyone else that day. Almost instantly, Jackie (Portman) begins planning the funeral, even before Air Force One can return to Washington. She is far more concerned about her husband’s legacy than his killer. Bobby (Peter Sarsgaard) tries to calm his sister-in-law but she refuses to cry or act the way those around her might expect. Weeks later she also refuses to offer up the details America wants to hear. She sits down with Life magazine’s Theodore H. White (Billy Crudup) at the Kennedy compound to explain herself.

There is something about the way Larraín presents this story, it feels like we haven’t heard it before, and for a new generation, that might be the case. It’s beyond gripping the way he presents the innocent Mrs. Kennedy touring the White House in that much talked about TV special. He juxtaposes her early moments with the now bitter and hollow woman who forcefully dictates, while puffing a cigarette, to the journalist. The flashbacks are articulately fragmented throughout the film, constantly relieving the hell Jackie faced that fateful day and those following.

Portman’s performance can relate to Cate Blanchett’s in “Blue Jasmine” in the way both characters express physical and emotional grief because of the loss of their husbands, status and relevance. Larraín’s effective use of extreme close-up with Portman’s face throughout the film captures the raw and often unpredictable reactions she has. He also showcases the horrified looks of people around her as they systematically judge her for unorthodox grieving behavior.

“Jackie” feels like an art film, a foreign film, a horror movie. It’s hard to describe and dissect what it really is. One thing it’s not, is boring. Functioning at times like a thriller that is offering up information in place of action scenes. The supporting cast are well assembled, truly earning their title of support to Portman’s powerhouse performance. Sarsgaard (“Blue Jasmine,” “The Magnificent Seven”) is especially good as the commanding brother, even telling the newly sworn President Johnson (John Carroll Lynch) to sit down in a moment of stern direction. Noah Oppenheim’s screenplay (which took top honors in Venice) isn’t afraid to expose Jackie’s flaws either. This is not some glorifying, idealistic portrait of the woman in the blood-soaked pink skirt and bonnet, it goes way beyond that, bone deep.

Final Thought — Implementing startling horror movie ingredients, Pablo Larraín delivers a masterpiece.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.